dc.contributor | Ruiz, F., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Pozo, M., Departamento de Geología y Geoquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Olías, M., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Núñez, M.C., Departamento de Derecho Público, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Abad, M., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Carretero, M.I., Departamento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Química agrícola, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; Vidal, J.R., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Cáceres, L.M., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Prenda, J., Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Castellanos, E.M., Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Luque, C.J., Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Menor, A., Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; Font, E., IDL-Faculdade de Ciencias da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Toscano, A., Departamento de Geodinámica y Paleontología, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain; García, E.X., Departamento de Botánica y Zoología, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico | |
dc.creator | Ruiz, F. | |
dc.creator | Pozo, M. | |
dc.creator | Olias, M. | |
dc.creator | Nunez, M.C. | |
dc.creator | Abad, M. | |
dc.creator | Carretero, M.I. | |
dc.creator | Vidal, J.R. | |
dc.creator | Caceres, L.M. | |
dc.creator | Prenda, J. | |
dc.creator | Castellanos, E.M. | |
dc.creator | Luque, C.J. | |
dc.creator | Menor, A. | |
dc.creator | Font, E. | |
dc.creator | Toscano, A. | |
dc.creator | García, E.X. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-15T19:06:33Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-04T00:00:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-15T19:06:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-04T00:00:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-09-15T19:06:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/45072 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-23744497990&partnerID=40&md5=9217cf6c6457d277c3239b93c485ad72 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1185/030079905X56529 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7251890 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Doñana National Park is one of the most important National Parks in Spain. The present-day scenario is the final result of a long geological evolution (~6 Myr), with the ?creatio? of a deep aquifer and numerous geomorphological features that enhance the biodiversity. This socio-ecological system presents numerous threats (invasive species, decrease of aquifer discharges, tourism resorts, sea level rise) and an adequate sustainable development is necessary in order to preserve this special system. " 2013 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.",,,,,,,,,"http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/45075","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896165296&partnerID=40&md5=e22c867974c617674d0bbf17815471ad",,,,,,,,"National Parks: Sustainable Development, Conservation Strategies and Environmental Impacts",,"219 | |
dc.description.abstract | 231",,,,"Scopus",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Doñana National Park (SW Spain): From the sea to the future",,"Book Chapter"
"46851","123456789/35008",,"Fonseca, F.A.H., Disciplina de Cardiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 458, São Paulo, Brazil; Ruiz, A., Medicina Interna y Epidemiologia Clínica, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia; Cardona-Muñoz, E.G., Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico; Silva, J.M., Servicio de Medicina II, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Fuenmayor, N., Servicio de Nefrologia Dialisis y Transplante, Hospital 'Miguel Pérez Carreño', Caracas, Venezuela; Marotti, M., AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom",,"Fonseca, F.A.H. | |
dc.description.abstract | Ruiz, A. | |
dc.description.abstract | Cardona-Munoz, E.G. | |
dc.description.abstract | Silva, J.M. | |
dc.description.abstract | Fuenmayor, N. | |
dc.description.abstract | Marotti, M.",,"2005",,"Background: International guidelines emphasize the need to achieve recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in order to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, many patients with hypercholesterolemia fail to achieve LDL-C goals on treatment. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for enabling patients to achieve National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) LDL-C goals. Secondary objectives were European LDL-C goal achievement, changes in the lipid profile, and safety. Research design and methods: This 12-week, multicenter, multinational, randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 10 mg with atorvastatin 10 mg in statin-naive and switched patients with primary hypercholesterolemia from Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Portugal, and Venezuela. Results: A total of 1124 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized to the two treatment groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, a significantly greater percentage of patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg compared with atorvastatin 10 mg achieved NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals (71.2% vs 61.4%, p < 0.001), 1998 European LDL-C goals (73.5% vs 59.2%, p < 0.001) and 2003 European LDL-C goals (58.9% vs 44.6%, p < 0.001). Rosuvastatin treatment was associated with significant reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) and, in statin-naive patients, a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) compared with atorvastatin treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events. Clinically significant elevations in creatinine, creatine kinase or hepatic transaminases were low and similar between treatment groups. Conclusions: Rosuvastatin 10 mg is significantly more effective at achieving NCEP ATP III and European LDL-C goals, lowering LDL-C and TC in both naive and switched patients and increasing HDL-C in naive patients than atorvastatin 10 mg, with a similar safety and tolerability profile. This study also provides evidence regarding the comparative effects of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in Latin American and Portuguese populations. " 2005 Librapharm Limited. | |
dc.relation | Scopus | |
dc.relation | WOS | |
dc.relation | Current Medical Research and Opinion | |
dc.relation | 21 | |
dc.relation | 8 | |
dc.relation | 1307 | |
dc.relation | 1315 | |
dc.title | The DISCOVERY PENTA study: A DIrect Statin COmparison of LDL-C Value - An Evaluation of Rosuvastatin therapY compared with atorvastatin | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |