La emergencia de los sistemas de innovación inclusivos: aportes a su comprensión desde la modelación basada en agentes

dc.contributorRuiz Castañeda, Walter Lugo
dc.contributorRobledo Velásquez, Jorge
dc.contributorInnovación y Gestión Tecnológica
dc.contributor0000-0002-9612-2445
dc.contributorhttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000941751
dc.contributorhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria-Villalba-4
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=6DAz1hoAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.creatorVillalba Morales, María Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T18:52:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T00:25:29Z
dc.date.available2023-05-26T18:52:36Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T00:25:29Z
dc.date.created2023-05-26T18:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-07
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83882
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6651957
dc.description.abstractLos sistemas de innovación inclusivos tienen como propósito aportar a la reducción de la exclusión social a través de la innovación. Comprender cómo funciona este tipo de sistemas es de gran interés en las agendas de investigación de los países del Sur Global, dado los altos índices de problemas sociales que caracterizan la región. Una forma de aportar a dicha comprensión es explicando cómo emergen estos sistemas; propósito que se aborda en esta tesis de manera evolutiva, a través de la Modelación Basada en Agentes. Se creó un modelo a partir de bases teóricas sobre sistemas de innovación, innovación inclusiva, nuevos agentes y sus relaciones, procesos de enseñanza aprendizaje, tipos de conocimiento, direccionalidad, capacidades de innovación y capacidades para la inclusión; elementos relevantes en los sistemas de innovación inclusivos. El modelo fue validado en el sector agropecuario del municipio de La Unión, Colombia y permite simular diferentes escenarios que representan los sistemas de innovación convencionales y diferentes configuraciones de sistemas de innovación inclusivos. Mediante el análisis de seis escenarios se pudo concluir que la direccionalidad de los agentes juega un papel importante para detonar la emergencia de un sistema de innovación inclusivo; sumado a esto, es importante que existan agentes con capacidades de innovación y capacidades para la inclusión que se complementen, de tal forma que se pueda propiciar la participación de los excluidos en las dinámicas de innovación y la apropiación tanto del conocimiento científico y tecnológico como el conocimiento tradicional. Esto conlleva a propiciar el fortalecimiento de los agentes con las capacidades de vinculación social, como lo es el intermediario inclusivo, con el objeto de poder lograr un sistema balanceado, es decir, que existan agentes con las diferentes capacidades requeridas para resolver y/o aprovechar las necesidades, oportunidades de innovación, problemas e ideas que determinan un entorno inclusivo (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of inclusive innovation systems is to contribute to reduce of social exclusion through innovation. Understanding how this type of system works is of great interest in the research agendas of the Global South countries, given the high rates of social problems that characterize the region. One way to contribute to this understanding is by explaining how these systems emerge; purpose that is addressed in this thesis in an evolutionary way, through Agent-Based Modeling. A model was created based on theoretical background on innovation systems, inclusive innovation, new agents and their relationships, teaching-learning processes, types of knowledge, directionalities, innovation capabilities and capabilities for inclusion; all of them are relevant elements in inclusive innovation systems. The model was validated in the agricultural sector of the municipality of La Unión, Colombia and allows simulating different scenarios to represent conventional innovation systems and different configurations of inclusive innovation systems. Through the analysis of six scenarios, it was possible to conclude that the directionality of the agents plays an important role in triggering the emergence of an inclusive innovation system; added to this, it is important that there are agents with innovation capacities and capacities for inclusion that complement each other, in such a way the participation of the excluded in innovation dynamics and the appropriation of both scientific and technological knowledge like traditional knowledge can be promoted. This leads to promoting the strengthening of agents with the capacities of social connection, such as the inclusive intermediary, in order to be able to achieve a balanced system, that is, it is necessary agents with different capacities exists to solve and/or take advantage of the needs, innovation opportunities, problems and ideas that determine an inclusive environment
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherMedellín - Minas - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.publisherFacultad de Minas
dc.publisherMedellín
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relationLaReferencia
dc.relationAbdelaty, H., & Weiss, D. (2021). R&D capacity and the innovation collaboration paradox: the moderating role of the appropriation strategy. Innovation: Organization and Management, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1971992
dc.relationAltenburg, T. (2008). Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries-why it is necessary to rethink the policy agenda. IV Globelics Conference, July, 1–17. http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/35162
dc.relationAltenburg, T., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2009). Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries: Challenges for IS research. In Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting (pp. 33–56). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.00008
dc.relationAltieri, M. A., Funes-Monzote, F. R., & Petersen, P. (2012). Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0065-6
dc.relationAlvarez C., Y., & Alonso M., I. (2000). EL PROCESO DE VALIDACIÓN DE LOS MODELOS SOCIO-ECONÓMICOS DINÁMICOS. Universidad de Oviedo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas ), 196.
dc.relationAlzugaray, S., Mederos, L., & Sutz, J. (2012). Building Bridges: Social Inclusion Problems as Research and Innovation Issues. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00592.x
dc.relationAlzugaray, S., Mederos, L., & Sutz, J. (2013). Investigación e innovación para la inclusión social: La trama de la teoría y de la política. Isegoria, 48, 25–50. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2013.048.02
dc.relationArber, G., Gordon, A., Sleiman, C., Alegría, D., De, V., & Koenig, M. (2014). Innovación social, ciencia y tecnología para el desarrollo inclusivo V Serie de Documentos de Trabajo.
dc.relationArchibugi, D., Howells, J., & Michie, J. (1999). Innovation systems in a global economy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(4), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373299107311
dc.relationArdanche, M., Bianco, M., Cohanoff, C., Contreras, S., Goñi, M., Simón, L., & Sutz, J. (2018). The power of wind: An analysis of a Uruguayan dialogue regarding an energy policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx041
dc.relationArocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2017). Developmental universities in inclusive innovation systems: Alternatives for knowledge democratization in the Global South. Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems: Alternatives for Knowledge Democratization in the Global South, 1–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2
dc.relationArocena, R., Görasson, B., & Sutz, J. (2018). Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems - Alternatives for Knowledge Democratization in the Global South | Rodrigo Arocena | Palgrave Macmillan. In Libro. https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319641515
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking at National Systems of Innovation from the South. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670247
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2003). Inequality and innovation as seen from the South. Technology in Society, 25(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00025-3
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2004). Desigualdad, subdesarrollo y procesos de aprendizaje. Nueva Sociedad, 193, 46–61.
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2021). Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162(February 2020), 120399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120399
dc.relationArthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. N., & Lane, D. A. (2018). The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, January 1997. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429496639
dc.relationArza, V., & Fressoli, M. (2015). Ciencia abierta, beneficios colectivos.
dc.relationArza, V., Fressoli, M., & Lopez, E. (2017). Ciencia abierta en Argentina: un mapa de experiencias actuales. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 28(55), 78–114. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/145/14553608004.pdf
dc.relationAsheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing Regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
dc.relationAsheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2009). The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011
dc.relationAsheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local “Sticky” and Global “Ubiquitous” Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjtecht/v_3a27_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a77-86.htm
dc.relationBancolombia. (2019). Del campo al mundo: El sector agropecuario en Colombia. Bancolombia.
dc.relationBanerjee, M. (2009). Power, knowledge, medicine : Ayurvedic pharmaceuticals at home and in the world. Orient BlackSwan.
dc.relationBarguil, D. (2016). El agro en Colombia: una mina de oro, por David Barguil. Semana. https://www.semana.com/opinion/columnistas/articulo/el-agro-en-colombia-una-mina-de-oro-por-david-barguil/222267/
dc.relationBatterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220512
dc.relationBelderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8–9), 1237–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
dc.relationBenedicto Chuaqui, J. (2002). Acerca de la historia de las universidades. In Revista Chilena de Pediatria (Vol. 73, Issue 6, pp. 563–565). Sociedad Chilena de Pediatría. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062002000600001
dc.relationBerchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
dc.relationBertalanffy, L. Von. (1989). Teoría general de los sistemas: Fundamentos, Desarrollo, Aplicaciones; General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. In Teoría general de los sistemas: fundamentos, desarrollo, aplicaciones (Issue 65, p. 336). https://archivosociologico.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/teoria-general-de-los-sistemas-ludwig-von-bertalanffy.pdf
dc.relationBharathy, G. K., & Silverman, B. (2010). Validating agent based social systems models. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2010.5679142
dc.relationBianchi, C., & Ardanche, M. (2013). Conferência Internacional LALICS 2013 “Sistemas Nacionais de Inovação e Políticas de CTI para um Desenvolvimento Inclusivo e Sustentável” 11 e 12 de Novembro, 2013 – Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 1–22.
dc.relationBianchi, C., Bianco, M., Ardanche, M., & Schenck, M. (2015). Inclusive Innovation and Policy Mismatch in Health Care. A Uruguayan Local Experience. In Health Innovation Systems, Equity and Development (pp. 297–321).
dc.relationBianchi, C., Bianco, M., & Schenck, M. (2013). “Sistemas Nacionais de Inovação e Políticas de CTI para um Desenvolvimento Inclusivo e Sustentável.”
dc.relationBianchi, C., Bianco, M., & Snoeck, M. (2014). Value attributed to STI activities and policies in Uruguay. In Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development: The Latin American Experience (pp. 133–155). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7_7
dc.relationBiggs, T., Shah, M., & Srivastava, P. (1995). Technological capabilities and learning in African enterprises: Foreword. United Nations University. http://www.nzdl.org/cgi-bin/library.cgi?e=d-00000-00---off-0hdl--00-0----0-10-0---0---0direct-10---4-------0-1l--11-en-50---20-about---00-0-1-00-0-0-11-1-0utfZz-8-10&cl=CL1.17&d=HASH6865750455cb7551582902.1&gt=2
dc.relationBorshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Even to Practical Agent Based Modeling. The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
dc.relationBotha, L., Grobbelaar, S., & Bam, W. (2016). Towards a framework to guide the evaluation of inclusive innovation systems. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3SpecialIssue), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.7166/27-3-1632
dc.relationBrundenius, C., Lundvall, B.-Å., & Sutz, J. (2009). The role of universities in innovation systems in developing countries: Developmental university systems - empirical, analytical and normative perspectives. In Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting (pp. 311–333). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.00019
dc.relationCadavid, D. L. (2015). Aproximación metodológica al análisis de la difusión de innovaciones en productos que utilizan tecnologías limpias considerando elecciones individuales de adopción. 347.
dc.relationCalvo Giraldo, O. (2018). La Gestión del Conocimiento en las Organizaciones y las Regiones: Una Revisión de la Literatura. Tendencias, 19(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.181901.91
dc.relationCárdenas, L. (2021). Intermediarios y volatilidad de precios, problemas de nunca acabar del agro colombiano. UdeA. https://www.udea.edu.co/wps/portal/udea/web/inicio/udea-noticias/udea-noticia/!ut/p/z0/fYy9DsIwEINfhaUjulBKgLFiQEIMDAi1t6AjidqDNtefgHh8WhgQC4tlf7INCBmgpwcXFFg8VUPOUZ9X6008SxO1VzrRKtWHZLGMt_PjScEO8H9heOBr22IKaMQH9wyQNdIFqu7WUaSo_02l1O7jR514CWyY-ki9156tjK0v
dc.relationCardona, A., Asesor, B., Vargas, M. E., Asesor, S., Vargas Sáez, M. E., & De Administración, E. (2016). Agricultura en el Oriente antioqueño, transformación rural contemporánea; para el desarrollo local y regional: estudio de caso empresarial.
dc.relationCardona A., M., & Escobar A., S. (2012). Innovation in the Productive Industrial Transformation: Contributions To the Discussion. Semestre Económico, 15(31), 127–152.
dc.relationCarlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
dc.relationCarrasco, P. (2017). Towards inclusivity through a theoretical and empirical approach inclusive innovation framework and an adivasis’ case of study.
dc.relationCarter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
dc.relationCassiolato, J. E., Lastres, H. M., & Couto, S. M. C. (2008). Innovation in unequal societies: how can it contribute to improve equality? International Seminar Science, Technology, Innovation and Social Inclusion, January 2008, 1–19. http://indialics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/15.pdf
dc.relationCastañeda, G. (2009). Sociomática: El estudio de los sistemas adaptables complejos en el entorno socioeconómico. Trimestre Economico, 76(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v76i301.474
dc.relationCentro de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible para América Latina. (2021). Los retos de la agricultura colombiana frente al cambio climático.
dc.relationCentro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2022). Masacre de Mesopotamia: construir memoria para recuperar el tejido social - Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. https://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/masacre-de-mesopotamia-construir-memoria-para-recuperar-el-tejido-social/
dc.relationChataway, J., Daniels, C., Kanger, L., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. (2017). Developing and enacting Transformative Innovation Policy: A Comparative Study Joanna. 8th International Sustainability Transitions Conference, 2–27.
dc.relationConceiçao, P., Gibson, D. V., Heitor, M. V., & Sirilli, G. (2001). Knowledge for Inclusive Development: The Challenge of Globally Integrated Learning and Implications for Science and Technology Policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 66(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00075-5
dc.relationonsejo Municipal de Gestión del Riesgp de Desastres. (2013). Plan municipal de gestón del riesgo de desastres. https://node2.123dok.com/dt02pdf/123dok_es/000/631/631764.pdf.pdf?X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=aa5vJ7sqx6H8Hq4u%2F20220310%2F%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20220310T160225Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=ho
dc.relationCORNARE, Alianza Clima y Desarrollo, Fundación Natura, & World Wildlife Fund. (2016). Actividad económica actual en el Oriente Antioqueño y perspectivas de crecimiento verde y desarrollo compatible con el clima - Anexo 4. 55.
dc.relationCroitoru, A. (2012). Schumpeter, J.A., 1934 (2008), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, translated from the German by Redvers Opie, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 3(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1278975
dc.relationDANE. (2021). Pobreza monetaria. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/pobreza-y-condiciones-de-vida/pobreza-monetaria
dc.relationDarvishi, M., & Ahmadi, G. (2014). Validation techniques of agent based modelling for geospatial simulations. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 40(2W3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W3-91-2014
dc.relationDatasketch. (2020). Cuatro líderes sociales son reconocidos por su labor en Colombia. http://lideres-sociales.datasketch.co/post/cuatro-lideres-sociales-son-reconocidos-por-su-labor-en-colombia
dc.relationDavis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351453
dc.relationDel Junco, C. J. G., & Dutschke, C. G. (2007). Las organizaciones con capacidad de aprendizaje. A propósito de una revisión de la literatura. Acimed, 16(5).
dc.relationDepartamento Administrativo de Planeación, A. (2020). La Unión. Ficha Municipal 2019 - 2020 (Vol. 2019, Issue Ecv 2019).
dc.relationDNP Colombia. (2011). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2010-2014 Colombia. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia., Tomo 1, 541.
dc.relationDongsheng, Y., & Yongan, Z. (2008). Innovation based on Multi-Agent method. Proceedings - International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, CSSE 2008, 1, 528–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.751
dc.relationDuque, M. I., & González, J. M. (2016). Sistemas de Abastecimiento Alimentario. Bases para la Inclusión de la Agricultura Familiar.
dc.relationDutrénit, G., & Sutz, J. (2013). Sistemas de innovación para un desarrollo inclusivo. La experiencia latinoamericana. Edward Elgar Publishing AG.
dc.relationEdelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A. (2001). Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(24), 13763–13768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231499798
dc.relationEdquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. In Long Range Planning (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(98)90244-8
dc.relationEdquist, C. (2001). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An Account of the State of the Art. DRUID Conference, December, 12–15.
dc.relationElkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks : the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers. https://www.worldcat.org/es/title/cannibals-with-forks-the-triple-bottom-line-of-21st-century-business/oclc/39658832
dc.relationFAO. (2002). Agricultura mundial: hacia los años 2015/2030. https://www.fao.org/3/y3557s/y3557s06.htm
dc.relationFoster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.7
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496190
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter. https://www.amazon.com/Technology-Policy-Economic-Performance-Lessons/dp/0861879287
dc.relationFressoli, M., Dias, R., & Thomas, H. (2014). Innovation and inclusive development in the south: A critical perspective. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/9780262027458.003.0003
dc.relationGarcia, R., & Jager, W. (2011). From the Special Issue Editors: Agent-Based Modeling of Innovation Diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00788.x
dc.relationGarcía, S. (2016). Alerta por uso excesivo de plaguicidas en Oriente. UdeA Noticias.
dc.relationGEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021). Nuestro reto: impacta la dinámica emprendedora colombiana GEM Colombia 2021-2022. https://gemconsortium.org/report/nuestro-reto-impacta-la-dinamica-emprendedora-colombiana-gem-colombia-2021-2022
dc.relationGeorge, G., Mcgahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x
dc.relationGilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., & Pyka, A. (2007). Learning in innovation networks: Some simulation experiments. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 378(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.050
dc.relationGilbert, N., Pyka, A., & Ahrweiler, P. (2001). Innovation Networks - A Simulation Approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(3). https://www.jasss.org/4/3/8.html
dc.relationGilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.007
dc.relationGliessman, S. (2016). Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(3), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765
dc.relationGoldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
dc.relationGómez, M. E., Villalba, M. L., & Pérez, D. M. (2020). INNOVAR Análisis comparativo de las capacidades de innovación tecnológica de la industria Estrategia y Organizaciones.
dc.relationGras, N. (2012). Innovación orientada a la inclusión social : un modelo basado en agentes.
dc.relationGras, N., Dutrénit, G., & Vera-Cruz, M. (2017). Innovaciones inclusivas: un modelo basado en agentes. El Proceso de Modelado En Economìa y Ciencias de La Gestiòn, March, 57–101.
dc.relationGrillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., & Moodysson, J. (2019). Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy, 48(4), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
dc.relationGrobbelaar, S. S. (Saartjie., Schiller, U., & de wet, G. (2017). University-supported inclusive innovation platform: The case of university of Fort Hare. Innovation and Development, 7(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2016.1252376
dc.relationGros, S., & Lara, N. (2009). Estrategias de innovación en la educación superior: el caso de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
dc.relationGupta, A. K. (2000). Grassroots innovations for survival. ILEIA Newsletter, Vol. 16, N.o 2. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=NL2000004018
dc.relationGupta, A. K. (2007). Towards an inclusive innovation model for sustainable development 1. 32, 1817–1827.
dc.relationGupta, A. K. (2012). Innovations for the poor by the poor. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 5(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2012.044875
dc.relationGupta, A. K. (1995). People’s Knowledge for Survival: Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Natural Resource Management. 16–23.
dc.relationHabimana, P & Kaze, E. (2009). Creating an inclusive society: practical strategies to promote social integration. Division for Social Policy and Development United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2008/Paris-report.pdf
dc.relationHagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
dc.relationHall, A. (2005). Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: An innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. Journal of International Development, 17(5), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1227
dc.relationHartley, D., & Starr, S. (2010). Verification and validation. Estimating Impact: A Handbook of Computational Methods and Models for Anticipating Economic, Social, Political and Security Effects in International Interventions, 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6235-5_11
dc.relationHeeks, R, Mirta, A., Kintu, R., & Shah, N. (2013). Inclusive innovation: definition, conceptualisation and future research priorities (development informatics Working Paper Series, Paper No. 53). Development Informatics, 1–26. http://www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/di-wp53/
dc.relationHeeks, Richard, Amalia, M., Kintu, R., & Shah, N. (2019). Inclusive Innovation: Definition, Conceptualisation and Future Research Priorities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438439
dc.relationHeeks, Richard, Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2014.928982
dc.relationHekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013
dc.relationHekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
dc.relationHolland, J. H. (1998). Emergence : from chaos to order. Addison-Wesley.
dc.relationHolland, J. H. (2004). El Orden Oculto de como la adaptación crea la complejidad (Issue 1).
dc.relationHooli, L. J., & Jauhiainen, J. S. (2018). Building an innovation system and indigenous knowledge in Namibia. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1436737
dc.relationHormecheas, K. C. (2021). Representación de efectos de políticas de innovación transformativa en el desempeño sostenible de los sistemas de innovación.
dc.relationHülsmann, M., Tilebein, M., Cordes, P., & Stolarski, V. (2011). Cognitive diversity of top management teams as a competence-based driver of innovation capability: How to decode its contribution comprehensively. Strategies and Communications for Innovations: An Integrative Management View for Companies and Networks, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17223-6_4
dc.relationIammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. In European Planning Studies (Vol. 13, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107084
dc.relationInce, H., Imamoglu, S. Z., & Turkcan, H. (2016). The Effect of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Absorptive Capacity on Firm Innovativeness: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.078
dc.relationIosif, A. E., & Tăchiciu, L. (2016). Assessment of the service innovation system in the region of Bucharest-Ilfov. Amfiteatru Economic, 18(41), 8–24.
dc.relationIsaksen, A., & Asheim, B. T. (2001). Los sistemas regionales de innovación, las PYMEs y la política de innovación. In Sistemas Regionales de Innovación (pp. 93–114).
dc.relationIsoglio, A., & Echeverry-Mejía, J. A. (2019). Reconocimiento de experticias y orientación hacia problemas sociales: las prácticas de ciencia abierta desde la perspectiva de la investigación integrada. Ciencia y Sociedad, 44(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2019.v44i1.pp29-42
dc.relationITM. (2022a). Institucional – ITM. https://www.itm.edu.co/institucional/
dc.relationITM. (2022b). Investigación – ITM. https://www.itm.edu.co/investigacion/
dc.relationJessop, B., Moulaert. Frank, Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis? In Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 110–130). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305387067
dc.relationJianhua, L., Wenrong, L., & Xiaolong, X. (2008). Research on agent-based simulation method for innovation system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information ManagementProceedings of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, ICIII 2008, 2, 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2008.179
dc.relationJiménez, A. (2019). Inclusive innovation from the lenses of situated agency: insights from innovation hubs in the UK and Zambia. Innovation and Development, 9(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2018.1445412
dc.relationJoffre, O. M., Klerkx, L., Dickson, M., & Verdegem, M. (2017). How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action. Aquaculture, 470(October), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.12.020
dc.relationJohn S. Carson, I. (2002). Model verification and validation. Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference.
dc.relationohnson and Andersen. (2012). Learning , Innovation and Inclusive Development New perspectives on economic development (Issue February 2015). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272795954_Learning_Innovation_and_Inclusive_Development_-_New_perspectives_on_economic_development_strategy_and_development_aid
dc.relationKaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.003
dc.relationKiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., & Wakolbinger, L. M. (2012). Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: A review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(2), 183–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10100-011-0210-Y
dc.relationKilelu, C., Klerkx, L., Omore, A., Baltenweck, I., Leeuwis, C., & Githinji, J. (2017). Value Chain Upgrading and the Inclusion of Smallholders in Markets: Reflections on Contributions of Multi-Stakeholder Processes in Dairy Development in Tanzania. European Journal of Development Research, 29(5), 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0074-z
dc.relationKleindorfer, G. B., O’Neill, L., & Ganeshan, R. (1998). Validation in simulation: Various positions in the philosophy of science. Management Science, 44(8), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1087
dc.relationKlerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020). Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 184(August), 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901
dc.relationLamers, D., Schut, M., Klerkx, L., & van Asten, P. (2017). Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Science and Public Policy, 44(6), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx009
dc.relationLeach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., Thompson, J., Millstone, E., Ely, A., Arond, E., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211
dc.relationLeibovich, J., & Estrada, L. (2017). Competitividad del sector agropecuario colombiano. Informe Nacional de Competitividad 2011 – 2012, 139–168.
dc.relationLeyva, S. L. (2014). Las universidades en la economía del conocimiento1. Revista de La Educación Superior, 43(170), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2015.02.006
dc.relationLin, F. J., Wu, S. H., Hsu, M. S., & Perng, C. (2016). The determinants of government-sponsored R&D alliances. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5192–5195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.111
dc.relationLove, T. S., & Roy, K. R. (2018). Opinion By Tyler S . Love and Kenneth R . Roy. October 2018.
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. In Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Issue January 1985).
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User Producer Interaction to National systems of Innovation. In G. et. al. (eds. . Dosi (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic theory. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/innovation-as-an-interactive-process-from-user-producer-interacti-2
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (2004). The economics of knowledge and learning. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 8, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-1071(04)08002-3/FULL/XML
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National systems of Innovation: Toward a theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The Learning Economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719400000002
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Libro. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/handbook-of-innovation-systems-and-developing-countries-9781847206091.html
dc.relationLundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems - Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
dc.relationMacal, C. M. (2010). To agent-based simulation from system dynamics. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 2001, 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2010.5679148
dc.relationMacal, C. M., & North, M. J. (2009). Agent-based modeling and simulation. 86–98.
dc.relationMalerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(1–2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688
dc.relationMalerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (1999). “History-friendly” models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ICC/8.1.3
dc.relationMarch, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(No 1 Special), 71–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634940
dc.relationMartin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1219–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
dc.relationMartínez, N., Dutrénit, G., Gras, N., & Tecuanhuey, E. (2018). Actores, relaciones estructurales y causalidad en la innovación inclusiva: un caso de telemedicina en México. Innovar, 28(70), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v28n70.74444
dc.relationMashelkar, R. A. (2013). More From Less For More (MLM): The Power of Inclusive Innovation. http://mashelkar.com/articles/more-from-less-for-more-mlm-the-power-of-inclusive-innovation/
dc.relationMinAgricultura. (2018). El agro colombiano se consolidó como el motor de la economía nacional. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/noticias/Paginas/El-agro-colombiano-se-consolidó-como-el-motor-de-la-economía-nacional.aspx
dc.relationMinCiencias. (2022). Términos y Siglas - Todos los elementos. https://www.reincorporacion.gov.co/es/atencion/lists/trminos y siglas/allitems.aspx
dc.relationMorales, M., Ortíz Riaga, C., & Arias Cante, M. (2012). Determining factors in innovation processes: a quick look at the Latinamerican current situation. Revista EAN, 72, 148–163.
dc.relationMostafavi, A., Abraham, D. M., Delaurentis, D., & Sinfield, J. (2011). Exploring the dimensions of systems of innovation analysis: A system of systems framework. IEEE Systems Journal, 5(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2011.2131050
dc.relationMoulaert, F. 1951-. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research.
dc.relationMoulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2014). THE international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Revija
dc.relationNadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. New York: Oxford University Press | Organization Design Forum (ODF). Oxford University Press. https://organizationdesignforum.org/project/nadler-d-a-tushman-m-l-nadler-m-b-1997-competing-by-design-the-power-of-organizational-architecture-new-york-oxford-university-press/
dc.relationNaylor, T. H., Finger, J., Naylor, T. H., & Finger, J. (1967). Verification of Computer Simulation Models. Management Science, 14(2), B92–B101. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.14.2.B92
dc.relationNelson, R. R. (1996). National Innovation Systems: A Retrospective on a Study. In Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise (pp. 381–409). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_17
dc.relationNjøs, R., & Fosse, J. K. (2019). Linking the bottom-up and top-down evolution of regional innovation systems to policy: organizations, support structures and learning processes. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1438248
dc.relationO’Donovan, C., & Smith, A. (2020). Technology and Human Capabilities in UK Makerspaces. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1704706
dc.relationOECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific; Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/scie
dc.relationPansera, M., & Martinez, F. (2017). Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0013
dc.relationParks, D. (2022). Directionality in transformative innovation policy: who is giving directions? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43(October 2021), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.02.005
dc.relationParra, R. De, & Cecilia, H. (2010). Difusión, mecanismo fundamental para el conocimiento que se produce en la Universidad. Visión Gerencial ISSN:, 215–218.
dc.relationPeerally, J. A., De Fuentes, C., & Figueiredo, P. N. (2019). Inclusive innovation and the role of technological capability-building: The social business Grameen Danone Foods Limited in Bangladesh. Long Range Planning, 52(6), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.04.005
dc.relationPetersen, I. haam, Kruss, G., Gastrow, M., & Nalivata, P. C. (2018). Innovation Capacity-Building and Inclusive Development in Informal Settings: A Comparative Analysis of two Interactive Learning Spaces in South Africa and Malawi. Journal of International Development, 30(5), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3232
dc.relationPhichonsatcha, T., Pentrakoon, D., Gerdsri, N., & Kanjana-Opas, A. (2022). Extending indigenous knowledge to unveil the evolutionary journey of food preferences and socio-cultural phenomena. Appetite, 170(December 2021), 105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105884
dc.relationPlanes-Satorra, S., & Paunov, C. (2017). Inclusive innovation policies : Lessons from International Case Studies. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/a09a3a5d-en
dc.relationPrahalad, C. K. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. In Publishing as Wharton School Publishing.
dc.relationPrahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505251
dc.relationProcuraduría General de la Nación, & Red Colombiana de Organizaciones Comunitarias Ambientalmente Amigables Red Colombia Verde. (2019). Pueblo Indígena Wayuú. Caracterización. Contrato PDG-BID-028/2019.
dc.relationQuintero Ramírez, S. (2016). Aprendizaje en los sistemas regionales de innovación: Un modelo basado en agentes.
dc.relationQuintero Ramírez, S., Ruiz Castañeda, W. L., Giraldo Ramírez, D. P., Vélez Acosta, L. M., Marín Sánchez, B. M., Cubillos Jiménez, S., & Cárdenas Garcés, A. Y. (2019). Modelo de transferencia de tecnología para las cadenas productivas agropecuarias: Análisis comparativo de las cadenas del café y el aguacate en Antioquia. https://repository.upb.edu.co/handle/20.500.11912/4899
dc.relationRamani, S. V, Sadreghazi, S., & Duysters, G. (2010). On the Delivery of Pro-Poor Innovations: Managerial Lessons from Sanitation Activists in India. 31, 1–31.
dc.relationRobledo, J. (2007). De los grupos consolidados de investigación a los sistemas dinámicos de innovación: el desafío actual del desarrollo científico y tecnológico colombiano. Dyna, 74(152), 1–7.
dc.relationRobledo, J. (2017). Introducción a la gestión tecnogía y la innovación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín Facultad de Minas, 1–259.
dc.relationRobledo, J., Gómez, F. A., & Restrepo, J. F. (2008). Relación entre capacidades de innovación tecnológica y desempeño empresarial en Colombia. 21.
dc.relationRobledo, J., López, C., Zapata, W., & Pérez, J. (2010). Desarrollo de una Metodología de Evaluación de Capacidades de Innovación. Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, 15, 133–148.
dc.relationRodríguez, L. (2020). Pobreza campesinos, situación en las zonas rurales: Fensuagro: En Colombia hay campesinos que solo ganan $20.000 pesos diarios | Al Campo | Caracol Radio. Caracol Radio. https://caracol.com.co/programa/2020/05/02/al_campo/1588421311_841789.html
dc.relationRogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition.
dc.relationRothwell, R. (1994). Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. In International Marketing Review (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491
dc.relationRuiz-Castañeda, W. (2016). Análisis del impacto de los intermediarios en los sistemas de innovación: Una propuesta desde el modelado basado en agentes. In Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín.
dc.relationRuiz, W. (2016). Análisis del impacto de los intermediarios en los sistemas de innovación: Una propuesta desde el modelado basado en agentes [Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/56636
dc.relationRuiz, W., Quintero, S., & Robledo, J. (2016). Impacto de los Intermediarios en los Sistemas de Innovación. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 11(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000200013
dc.relationSaha, D., & Vasuprada, T. M. (2021). Reconciling conflicting themes of traditionality and innovation: an application of research networks using author affiliation. Advances in Traditional Medicine, 21(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-020-00515-w
dc.relationSakakibara, M. K. O. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(SPEC. ISS.), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::aid-smj927>3.3.co;2-p
dc.relationSampedro, J. L., & Díaz, C. (2016). Innovación para el desarrollo inclusivo: Una propuesta para su análisis. Economía Informa, 396, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecin.2016.01.002
dc.relationSánchez-Morales, P., & Hernández-Ortiz, P. (2014). Sistema milpa. Elemento de identidad campesina e indígena. Programa de Intercambio, Diálogo y Asesoría En Agricultura Sostenible y Soberanía Alimentaria (PIDAASSA), 25.
dc.relationSargent, R. G. (2005). Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. In M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, & F. B. ArmstrongJ. A. Joines (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 130–143). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsimulation.su%2Fuploads%2Ffiles%2Fdefault%2F2005-sargent-1.pdf&clen=365321&chunk=true
dc.relationSargent, Robert G. (1998). Verification And Validation Of Simulation Models.
dc.relationSargent, Robert G. (2007). Verification and validation of simulation models. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2007.4419595
dc.relationSargent, Robert G. (2005). Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. In M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, & F. B. ArmstrongJ. A. Joines (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 130–143).
dc.relationScarone, C. (2005). La innovación en la empresa : la orientación al mercado como factor de éxito en el proceso de innovación en producto. Programa de Doctorado Sobre La Sociedad de La Información y El Conocimiento, 118.
dc.relationSchlaile, M. P., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A. D., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., Fagerberg, J., & Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253
dc.relationSchot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
dc.relationSchot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2016). Framing Innovation Policy for Transformative Change: Innovation Policy 3.0. Science Policy Research Unit, 2, 0–26. http://www.johanschot.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SchotSteinmueller_FramingsWorkingPaperVersionUpdated2018.10.16-New-copy.pdf
dc.relationSchroeder, D., Dalton-Brown, S., Schrempf, B., & Kaplan, D. (2016). Responsible, Inclusive Innovation and the Nano-Divide. NanoEthics, 10(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0265-2
dc.relationSchumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. In Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3
dc.relationSchumpeter, J. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983911-11
dc.relationSen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, Application and Scrutiny. In Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank, Social Development Papers (Vol. 1, Issue June). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.100.1010&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf
dc.relationSENA. (2022a). Misión y Visión SENA. https://www.sena.edu.co/es-co/sena/Paginas/misionVision.aspx
dc.relationSENA. (2022b). Quiénes somos. https://www.sena.edu.co/es-co/sena/Paginas/quienesSomos.aspx
dc.relationSheppard, E., & Barnes, T. J. (1986). Instabilities in the Geography of Capitalist Production: Collective Vs. Individual Profit Maximization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8306.1986.TB00132.X
dc.relationShuaib, M., Hussain, F., Rauf, A., Jan, F., Romman, M., Parvez, R., Zeb, A., Ali, S., Abidullah, S., Bahadur, S., Shah, A. A., Azamh, N., Dilbari, S., Begumj, K., Khank, H., Sajjadl, S., Muhammadj, I., & Shahl, N. A. (2023). Traditional knowledge about medicinal plant in the remote areas of Wari Tehsil, Dir Upper, Pakistan. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 83, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.246803
dc.relationSierra-Vaca, O. A. (2013). Ensayo: el sector agropecuario en Colombia revestido en una colcha de retazos. 31.
dc.relationSimon, H. A. (1990). Bounded Rationality. Utility and Probability, 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_5
dc.relationSmith, A. (2017). Social Innovation, Democracy and Makerspaces. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30640.35843
dc.relationSmith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2013). Grassroots innovation movements: challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.12.025
dc.relationSmith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025
dc.relationSmith, A., & Light, A. (2017). Cultivating sustainable developments with makerspaces. Liinc Em Revista, 13(1), 162–174.
dc.relationSquassina, A. (2022). Construction Wisdom: Preserving Venice with Both Tradition and Innovation. Studies in Conservation, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2022.2046413
dc.relationSrinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2006). Economic Development and Innovation: Problem-solving in Scarcity Conditions. In Working Paper No. 13, Center for International Development at Harvard University (Vol. 16, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2008.12090228
dc.relationSunkel, O., & Infante, R. (2009). Hacia un Desarrollo Inclusivo. El Caso de Chile. 1–288.
dc.relationSutz, J. (2010). Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación e Inclusión Social: una agenda urgente para universidades y políticas i. Conocimiento y Sociedad, 1, 3–49.
dc.relationSutz, J., & Tomasini, C. (2013). Knowledge, innovation, social inclusion and their elusive articulation: when isolated policies are not enough. International Workshop on “New Models of Innovation for Development,” 1–23.
dc.relationTorre, C. D., Ravazzoli, E., Dijkshoorn-dekker, M., Polman, N., Melnykovych, M., Pisani, E., Gori, F., Re, R. Da, Vicentini, K., & Secco, L. (2020). The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas . Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(4440), 1–25.
dc.relationTorres, E., Torres, J., López, M., Loaiza, O., & Sanchez, C. (2020). La unión. Guía para la reactivación Económica.
dc.relationUCO. (2022). Institucional. https://www.uco.edu.co/institucional/Paginas/mision-vision.aspx
dc.relationUNAL. (2022a). Universidad Nacional de Colombia : Dirección de Investigación y Extensión - Sede Medellín - La investigación en la UNAL. https://investigacionyextension.medellin.unal.edu.co/investigacion/investigacion-en-la-sede.html
dc.relationUNAL. (2022b). Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Misión y Visión. https://unal.edu.co/la-universidad/mision-y-vision.html
dc.relationUriona Maldonado, M., & Grobbelaar, S. (2017). System Dynamics Models in the Innovation Systems domain : A review System Dynamics Models in the Innovation Systems domain : A review. 15th Globelics International Conference – Athens, Greece, July 2017, 33.
dc.relationUyarra, E. (2009). What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2009 20:1, 20(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00191-009-0135-Y
dc.relationvan den Hoven, J. (2012). Human Capabilities and Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 5, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_2
dc.relationvan der Hilst, B. (2012). Inclusive innovation systems. How innovation intermediaries can strengthen the innovation system. Utrect University, August, 1–68.
dc.relationvan der Merwe, E., & Grobbelaar, S. S. (Saartjie. (2018). Systemic policy instruments for inclusive innovation systems: Case study of a maternal mHealth project in South Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(6), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1491678
dc.relationVan Der Merwe, E., & Grobbelaar, S. S. S. (2016). Evaluating inclusive innovative performance: The case of the eHealth system of the Western Cape Region, South Africa. PICMET 2016 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management For Social Innovation, Proceedings, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806775
dc.relationVasermanis, E. K., Nechval, K. N., & Nechval, N. A. (2003). Statistical validation of simulation models of observable systems. Kybernetes, 32(5–6), 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920210443932/FULL/XML
dc.relationVilla, E., Hormecheas, K., & Robledo, J. (2017). De la innovación competitiva a la innovación inclusiva: El rol de la universidad latinoamericana. XVII Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica - ALTEC, March 2018.
dc.relationVillalba-Morales, M. L., Ruiz, W., & Robledo, J. (2019). Towards Inclusive Innovation Systems : The Role of the Excluded Groups. Proceedings - 28th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology (IAMOT 2019).
dc.relationVillalba, M. L. (2022). La emergencia de los sistemas de innovación inclusivos: una propuesta desde la modelación basada en agentes. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationWang, X., & Dass, M. (2017). Building innovation capability: The role of top management innovativeness and relative-exploration orientation. Journal of Business Research, 76, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.019
dc.relationWatts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees : the science of a connected age. 368.
dc.relationWeber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive “failures” framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
dc.relationWerker, C., Brenner, T. (2004). Empirical Calibration of Simulation Models. Papers on Economics and Evolution. Jena: Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems.
dc.relationWhitner, R. B., & Balci, O. (1989). Guidelines for selecting and using simulation model verification techniques. Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1145/76738.76811
dc.relationWilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2013). An introduction to agent-based modeling Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. In Agent analyst (Issue January).
dc.relationWittmann, F., Hufnagl, M., Lindner, R., Roth, F., & Edler, J. (2021). Governing varieties of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new typology. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab044
dc.relationWu, H., Chen, J., & Jiao, H. (2016). Dynamic capabilities as a mediator linking international diversification and innovation performance of firms in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2678–2686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.003
dc.relationYam, R. C. M., Lo, W., Tang, E. P. Y., & Law, A. K. W. (2010). Technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 1009–1017.
dc.relationYilian, Clavijo, R., Cabeza-Pullés, D., & Rafaela, N. (2018). Innovación en instituciones universitarias: una revisión de la literatura científica Innovation in Academic Institutions, a Review of the Scientific Literature. Dirección, 12(2), 22–39.
dc.relationZapata Quijano, O. J. (2012). La Producción De Papa En Dos Municipios Del Oriente Antioqueño: Análisis De Las Relaciones Precapitalistas Y Capitalistas En La Agricultura. Suma de Negocios, 3(2), 53–74.
dc.relationZhang, Z., & Wu, X. (2016). The inclusiveness of internet-based agri-business innovation system: A case study on Alibaba. PICMET 2016 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management For Social Innovation, Proceedings, 1098–1105.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleLa emergencia de los sistemas de innovación inclusivos: aportes a su comprensión desde la modelación basada en agentes
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución