dc.contributorAmaya Guio, Jairo
dc.contributorGrillo Ardila, Carlos Fernando
dc.creatorVargas Rodriguez, Duvan Daniel
dc.creatorSuarez Higuera, Erika Viviana
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T20:33:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T23:55:17Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T20:33:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T23:55:17Z
dc.date.created2023-01-16T20:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82953
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6651622
dc.description.abstractRiesgo de NIC 2+ de acuerdo con la edad, en mujeres que asisten al programa de tamización de la Subred Norte entre 2017 y 2021” Introducción: Según las últimas guías de la OMS para tamización de cáncer de cérvix se prioriza al grupo de 30 a 50 años de edad, mientras la guías nacionales incluyen a las paciente de 25 años hasta los 50 años. El objetivo del estudio es estimar la prevalencia de presentar lesiones NIC2+ según el grupo etario en mujeres atendidas en la unidad de colposcopia de la Subred Norte a partir de los hallazgos de citología, colposcopia e histología, en el periodo de 2017 a 2021. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizo un estudio observacional de cohorte transversal con muestreo por conveniencia, que incluyó datos de citologías y colposcopias realizadas en el periodo de 2017 a 2021 en la Subred Norte E.S.E (84996 datos), a los que se les aplicaron criterios de inclusión y exclusión, y eliminación de datos de seguimiento, para 49957 datos totales, que fueron tratados con Microsoft Excel, SQL Server y Visual Basic. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las variables y cálculo de prevalencia de NIC 2+ por grupos etarios. Resultados: Tenemos una población joven entre 30 y 50 años, la mediana de la edad fue 42 años (RIQ 28 – 53) y el 97,52% perteneciente al régimen subsidiado. El 8% de las mujeres tuvieron citologías anormales, de las que el 57% corresponde a ASC-US. El 40% tuvieron colposcopia anormal y la mayoría corresponden a LIE-BG. Un 60% de las biopsias tomadas fueron positivas, de las que la mayoría son NIC 1. Se estimó una prevalencia de 1,05% de NIC 2+ para la población total. La prevalencia de NIC2+ para menores de 25 años fue de 0,43%, de 25 a 29 años fue de 1,82%, de 30 a 49 años de 1,39% y de 50 a 65 años fue de 0,64%. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de NIC 2+ en las mujeres que asisten al programa de tamización de cáncer de cuello uterino en la Subred Norte entre el periodo 2017 a 2021 es mayor en el grupo 25 a 49 años y disminuye en los grupos de 18 a 24 y de 50 a 65 años. Para nuestra población es necesaria la tamización a partir de 25 años hasta los 50 años ya que tenemos alta prevalencia de NIC2 + en este grupo de edad y para nuestros programas de tamización no se debería dejar por fuera como lo propone la última guía de la OMS. Palabras clave: Citología cervicovaginal; Neoplasias del cuello uterino; Colposcopia; Virus del papiloma humano; Organización Mundial de la salud. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractRisk of CIN 2+ according to age, in women who attend the screening program of the Northern Subnet between 2017 and 2021” Introduction: According to the latest WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening, priority is given to the group of women between 30 and 50 years of age, whereas the national guidelines include patients from 25 to 50 years of age. The objective of the study is to estimate the prevalence of presenting CIN2+ lesions according to the age group in women treated in the colposcopy unit of the Northern Subnet based on the findings in their cytology, colposcopy, and histology, from 2017 to 2021. Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional cohort study was carried out with convenience sampling, which included data from cytology and colposcopy performed in the period from 2017 to 2021 in the ESE North Subnet (84,996 data), to which criteria of inclusion and exclusion, and removal of follow-up data was applied, for a data total of 49,957, which were treated with Microsoft Excel, SQL Server, and Visual Basic. A descriptive analysis of the variables and calculation of the prevalence of CIN 2+ by age group was performed. Results: We have a young population between 30 and 50 years old, the median age was 42 years (RIQ 28 - 53) and 97.52% belonged to the subsidized regime. 8% of the women had abnormal Pap smears, of which 57% corresponded to ASC-US. 40% had abnormal colposcopy and most correspond to LIE-BG. 60% of the biopsies taken were positive, of which the majority were CIN 1. A prevalence of 1.05% of CIN 2+ was estimated for the total population. The prevalence of CIN2+ for women under 25 years of age was 0.43%, from 25 to 29 years it was 1.82%, from 30 to 49 years it was 1.39% and from 50 to 65 years it was 0.64%. Conclusions: The prevalence of CIN 2+ in women who attend the cervical cancer screening program in the Northern Subnet between 2017 and 2021 is higher in the 25-49 age group and decreases in the 18-24 and the 50 to 65 years age groups. For our population, screening is necessary for ages between 25 to 50 years, since we have a high CIN2+ prevalence in this age group, and for our screening programs it should not be left out as proposed by the latest WHO guide. Key words : Papanicolaou Test, Colposcopy; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Prevalence; Human papillomavirus; World Health Organization.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisherBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationBray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al.Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 68: 394-424
dc.relationBhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2018). Cancer of the cervix uteri. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 143 Suppl 2, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611
dc.relationWoodman, C. B., Collins, S., Winter, H., Bailey, A., Ellis, J., Prior, P., Yates, M., Rollason, T. P., & Young, L. S. (2001). Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet (London, England), 357(9271), 1831–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(00)04956-4
dc.relationJain MA, Limaiem F. Cancer, (2022) Cervical Intraepithelial Squamous Cell Lesion. StatPearls Publishing
dc.relationRodríguez, A. C., Schiffman, M., Herrero, R., Wacholder, S., Hildesheim, A., Castle, P. E., Solomon, D., Burk, R., & Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste Group (2008). Rapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infections. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(7), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn044
dc.relationSchiffman, M., Castle, P. E., Jeronimo, J., Rodriguez, A. C., & Wacholder, S. (2007). Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet (London, England), 370(9590), 890–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0
dc.relationTainio, K. et al. (2018). Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 360, k499. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k499
dc.relationWHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention. (2021). (2nd ed.). World Health Organization
dc.relationPerkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. Journal of lower genital tract disease, 24(2), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525
dc.relationObservatorio Nacional de Cáncer- ONC. Guía de Práctica Clínica (GPC) para la detección y manejo de lesiones precancerosas de cuello uterino. Guía completa. Guía No44; Guías de Práctica clínica. 2014; Colombia. Guia 14:319.
dc.relationSung, H., et al (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
dc.relationDemarco M, Egemen D, Raine-Bennett TR, Cheung LC, Befano B, Poitras NE, et al. A Study of Partial Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Support of the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr 1;24(2):144–7.
dc.relationKoshiol, J., Lindsay, L., Pimenta, J. M., Poole, C., Jenkins, D., & Smith, J. S. (2008). Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of epidemiology, 168(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn036
dc.relationWaxman, A. G., Chelmow, D., Darragh, T. M., Lawson, H., & Moscicki, A. B. (2012). Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstetrics and gynecology, 120(6), 1465–1471.
dc.relationSanjosé, S., Brotons, M., & Pavón, M. A. (2018). The natural history of human papillomavirus infection. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 47, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.015
dc.relationMcBride, A. A., & Warburton, A. (2017). The role of integration in oncogenic progression of HPV-associated cancers. PLoS pathogens, 13(4), e1006211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006211
dc.relationWelby, S., Rosillon, D., Feng, Y., & Borys, D. (2022). Progression from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to cervical lesion or clearance in women (18-25 years): Natural history study in the control arm subjects of AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine efficacy study in China between 2008 and 2016. Expert review of vaccines, 21(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2022.2021077
dc.relationGravitt, P. E., & Winer, R. L. (2017). Natural History of HPV Infection across the Lifespan: Role of Viral Latency. Viruses, 9(10), 267.https://doi.org/10.3390/v910026
dc.relationMuñoz, N., et al, & Instituto Nacional de Cancerología HPV Study Group (2009). Persistence of HPV infection and risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of Colombian women. British journal of cancer, 100(7), 1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604972
dc.relationMoscicki, A. B., Ma, Y., Wibbelsman, C., Darragh, T. M., Powers, A., Farhat, S., & Shiboski, S. (2010). Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women. Obstetrics and gynecology, 116(6), 1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe777f
dc.relationCastle, P. E., Schiffman, M., Wheeler, C. M., & Solomon, D. (2009). Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstetrics and gynecology, 113(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818f5008
dc.relationMaglennon, G. A., McIntosh, P. B., & Doorbar, J. (2014). Immunosuppression facilitates the reactivation of latent papillomavirus infections. Journal of virology, 88(1), 710–716. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02589-13
dc.relationTing, J., Rositch, A. F., Taylor, S. M., Rahangdale, L., Soeters, H. M., Sun, X., & Smith, J. S. (2015). Worldwide incidence of cervical lesions: a systematic review. Epidemiology and infection, 143(2), 225–241.
dc.relationBeavis, A. L., Gravitt, P. E., & Rositch, A. F. (2017). Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States. Cancer, 123(6), 1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30507
dc.relationSchlichte, M. J., & Guidry, J. (2015). Current Cervical Carcinoma Screening Guidelines. Journal of clinical medicine, 4(5), 918–932.
dc.relationMalone, C., Barnabas, R. V., Buist, D. S. M., Tiro, J. A., & Winer, R. L. (2020). Costeffectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review. Preventive medicine, 132, 105953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105953
dc.relationOgilvie, G. S., et al. (2018). Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 320(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7464
dc.relationKoliopoulos, G., et al (2017). Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2
dc.relationCheung, L. C., et al. (2020). 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation. Journal of lower genital tract disease, 24(2), 90–101 https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528
dc.relationLiverani, C. A., et al. (2020). Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines in the Postvaccination Era: Review of the Literature. Journal of oncology, 2020, 8887672. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8887672
dc.relationFontham, E. T. H., et al (2020). Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 70(5), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21628
dc.relationAbd El All HS, et al (2007). Prevalence of cervical neoplastic lesions and Human Papilloma Virus infection in Egypt: National Cervical Cancer Screening Project. Infectious agents and cancer, 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-2-12.
dc.relationHav, M., et al (2016). Prevalence of Abnormal Cervical Cytology in HIVNegative Women Participating in a Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Calmette Hospital, Cambodia. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 17(7), 3101–3103.
dc.relationInsinga, R. P., Glass, A. G., & Rush, B. B. (2004). Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 191(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.043
dc.relationRolnick, S., LaFerla, J. J., Wehrle, D., Trygstad, E., & Okagaki, T. (1996). Pap smear screening in a health maintenance organization: 1986-1990. Preventive medicine, 25(2), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.0041
dc.relationGustavsson, I., et al (2019). Randomised study of HPV prevalence and detection of CIN2+ in vaginal self-sampling compared to cervical specimens collected by medical personnel. International journal of cancer, 144(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31637.
dc.relationAarnio, R., Isacson, I., Sanner, K., Gustavsson, I., Gyllensten, U., & Olovsson, M. (2021). Comparison of vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling by medical professionals for the detection of HPV and CIN2+: A randomized study. International journal of cancer, 148(12), 3051–3059. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33482
dc.relationRonco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Palma PD, del Mistro A, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Mar;11(3):249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2
dc.relationNaucler, P., et al. (2009). Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn444
dc.relationKitchener, H. C., et al. (2009). HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Oncology, 10(7), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70156-1
dc.relationRijkaart, D. C., et al. (2012). Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of highgrade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Oncology, 13(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0.
dc.relationOgilvie, G. S., et al. (2018). Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 320(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7464.
dc.rightsReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title“Riesgo de NIC 2+ de acuerdo con la edad, en mujeres que asisten al programa de tamización de la Subred Norte entre 2017 y 2021”
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución