Implicaciones del relacionamiento en la innovación transformativa

dc.contributorRuiz Castañeda, Walter Lugo
dc.contributorInnovación y Gestión Tecnológica
dc.contributorManotas Rodriguez, Eliana [0000-0001-9879-8070]
dc.contributorManotas Rodriguez, Eliana [0001730222]
dc.creatorManotas Rodriguez, Eliana
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T16:24:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T23:40:04Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T16:24:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T23:40:04Z
dc.date.created2023-02-01T16:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83225
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6651434
dc.description.abstractEn esta investigación se analizan cuáles son las características de una red que propicia la conformación de la innovación transformativa, con la finalidad de extraer los aspectos más importantes que dan robustez a este tipo de alianzas y convenios formales e informales, y de esta forma, ofrecer orientación sobre las capacidades que se deben desarrollar para ejecutar proyectos con este enfoque, de tal manera que se puedan replicar en diferentes contextos. Se presentan análisis cuantitativos de métricas de red, basándonos en Teoría de redes. Además, se propone un instrumento para medir capacidades de innovación tecnológica y transformadoras, el cual se utiliza dentro de un análisis de caso. Se encontró que las métricas de centralidad: grado medio, centralidad variada, intermediación central y centralidad de vector propio, suelen coincidir con los actores con mejor desempeño respecto a las capacidades tecnológicas de vinculación y difusión, y así mismo con las capacidades transformadoras de generación de redes y generación de expectativas. También se identifica que las capacidades tecnológicas de apropiación y mercado, unidas a las capacidades transformadoras de: autonomía, incidencia y legitimidad, gobernanza relacional y escalamiento, son las más difíciles de gestionar. Finalmente, se espera contribuir a un esquema conceptual mucho más claro para todos los grupos de interés, que desean ejecutar proyectos de este tipo. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractThis research analyzes the characteristics of a network that promotes the formation of transformative innovation, in order to extract the most important aspects that give strength to this type of alliances and formal and informal agreements, and in this way, offer guidance on the capabilities that must be developed to execute projects with this approach, in such a way that they can be replicated in different contexts. Quantitative analyzes of network metrics are presented, based on Network Theory. In addition, an instrument is proposed to measure technological and transformative innovation capabilities, which is used within a case analysis. It was found that the centrality metrics: average degree, Harmonic Closeness, Betweeness centrality and Page Rank, tend to coincide with the actors with the best performance regarding the technological capabilities of linkage and diffusion, and likewise with the transformative capabilities of generating information. networks and generation of expectations. It is also identified that the technological capacities of appropriation and market, together with the transformative capabilities of: autonomy, incidence and legitimacy, relational governance and scaling, are the most difficult to manage. Finally, it is expected to contribute to a much clearer conceptual scheme for all interest groups that wish to carry out projects of this type.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería Administrativa
dc.publisherFacultad de Minas
dc.publisherMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relationRedCol
dc.relationLaReferencia
dc.relationAcosta, A., & Arteaga, C. A. (2019). Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, AC. Obtenido Acosta, A., & Arteaga, C. A. (2019). Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, AC. Obtenido de https://www.foroconsultivo.org.mx/FCCyT/sites/default/files/nuevos_enfoques_inn ovacion_2019.pdf
dc.relationAhuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
dc.relationAlcaldía de Medellín. (Septiembre de 2015). www.medellin.gov.co. (D. A. Gómez Sanchez, Ed.) Obtenido de https://www.medellin.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/pccdesign/SubportaldelCiudadano_2/P landeDesarrollo_0_15/InformacinGeneral/Shared%20Content/Documentos/comun as/COMUNA8_VILLA_HERMOSA.pdf
dc.relationAlkemade, F., Negro, S., & Hekkert, M. P. (2011). Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 125-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009
dc.relationAltenburg, T. (2009). Chapter 2: Building Inclusive Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: Challenges for IS Research. En B.-Å. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, & J. Vang, Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.00008
dc.relationantioquiaamanece. (05 de Abril de 2022). 117 niños y niñas de la comuna 8 – Villa Hermosa iniciaron su ortodoncia preventiva. 117 niños y niñas de la comuna 8 – Villa Hermosa iniciaron su ortodoncia preventiva. Obtenido de https://www.antioquiaamanece.com/117-ninos-y-ninas-de-la-comuna-8-villa- hermosa-iniciaron-su-ortodoncia-preventiva/
dc.relationArgyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reis (Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas), 77(78), 345-348. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/40183951
dc.relationAvelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18, 628-649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
dc.relationAvelino, F., Dumitru, A., Cipolla, C., & Kunze, I. (2019). Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks. European Planning Studies, 28(5), 1- 23. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339
dc.relationBeers, P., Veldkamp, A., Hermans, F., Apeldoorn, D. v., Vervoort, J. M., & Kok, K. (2010). Future sustainability and images. Futures, 42(7), 723-732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.017
dc.relationBergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
dc.relationBoden, B., Haag, R., & Seidl, T. (2013). Detecting and exploring clusters in attributed graphs: a plugin for the gephi platform. CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management, (págs. 2505- 2508). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2508200
dc.relationBoon, W., & Edler, J. (2018). Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 435-447.
dc.relationBorgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013. doi:0.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4
dc.relationBorgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. doi:10.1126/science.1165821
dc.relationBosman, R., Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Pistorius, T. (2014). Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 45-59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003
dc.relationBurgess, J., & Chilvers, J. (2006). Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy, 33(10), 713-728. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778551
dc.relationBurt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge , MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationBurt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage & Closure. An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press
dc.relationButchart, S. H., Miloslavich , P., Reyers , B., Subramanian, S., Adams, C., Bennett, E., . . . Haigen , X. (2019). Chapter 3. Assessing progress towards meeting major international objectives related. En I. G. Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES. Obtenido de https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/ipbes_global_assessment_chapter_3_unedited_ 31may.pdf
dc.relationCarlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
dc.relationChaminade, C. (2020). Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability. Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200007
dc.relationColeman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA,: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationCortés, J. (2008). Web of Science: termómetro de la producción internacional de conocimiento: Ventajas y limitaciones. CULCyT Cultura Cient+ifica y Tecnológica, 29(5), 1-11. Obtenido de http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/culcyt/article/view/366
dc.relationCurran, K., & Curran, N. (2014). Social Networking Analysis. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 367-377. doi:DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_15
dc.relationDe Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511996368
dc.relationDhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
dc.relationDíaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E., Ngo, H., Guèze, M., Agard, J., . . . Purvis, A. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Obtenido de https://uwe- repository.worktribe.com/output/1493508/summary-for-policymakers-of-the-global- assessment-report-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-services-of-the- intergovernmental-science-policy-platform-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-services
dc.relationDiercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880- 894. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
dc.relationDiestel, R. (2000). Graph Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag. Obtenido de https://iuuk.mff.cuni.cz/~andrew/DiestelGT.pdf
dc.relationDoreian, P., & Stokman, F. (2013). Evolution of Social Networks. London: Routledge.
dc.relationEbersberger, B., & Herstad, S. J. (2013). The relationship between international innovation collaboration, intramural R&D and SMEs’ innovation performance: a quantile regression approach. The relationship between international innovation collaboration, intramural R&D and SMEs’ innovation performance: a quantile regression approach, 20(7), 626-630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.724158
dc.relationEdquist, C. (2013). Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Routledge.
dc.relationEhnert, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Barnes, J., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Kern, F., . . . Egermann, M. (2018). The Acceleration of Urban Sustainability Transitions:A Comparison of Brighton, Budapest, Dresden, Genk,and Stockholm. sustainability, 10(3), 1-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030612
dc.relationElzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.00001
dc.relationEPM. (19 de Octubre de 2014). epm.com.co. (U. D. Proveedores, Ed.) Obtenido de https://www.epm.com.co/site/Portals/0/Contrataci%C3%B3n%20Social%20.pdf
dc.relationFagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568-1576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012
dc.relationFazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Patterson, J., Hultman, J., Mierlo, B. v., . . . Wyborn, C. (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 54-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026
dc.relationFolke, C., Jansson, Å., Rockström, J., Olsson, P., Carpenter, S. R., III, F. C., . . . Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the Biosphere. AMBIO, 40, 719-738. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
dc.relationFoster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low- Income Consumers. The European Journal of Development Research, 25, 333- 355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.7
dc.relationFranco Gomez, L. M., & Hincapie Ballesteros, L. A. (2013). HÁBITAT Y POLÍTICAS HABITACIONALES: ESTRATEGIAS PARA LA CONSTRUCCION SOCIAL DEL HÁBITAT EN LAS COMUNAS 1 Y 8 DE MEDELLIN. ANÁLISIS SOCIOPOLÍTICO – CULTURAL. X Seminario Investigación Urbana y Regional. POLÍTICAS DE VIVIENDA Y DERECHOS HABITACIONALES. Reflexiones sobre la justicia Espacial en la Ciudad Latinoamericana, (págs. 1-18). Bogota. Obtenido de https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/cvyu/article/view/5918/4781
dc.relationFrans, H., Haarmann, W. M., & Dagevos, J. (2011). Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development. Regional Environmental Change, 11(4), 805-815. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0216-y
dc.relationFrantzeskaki, N., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Egermann, M., & Ehnert, F. (2017). Nature- Based Solutions Accelerating Urban Sustainability Transitions in Cities: Lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm Cities. En D. Loorbach, H. Shiroyama, J. M. Wittmayer, J. Fujino, & S. Mizuguchi, Nature‐based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice (págs. 65-88). Springer.
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1985). Japan: A new national system of Innovation. En G. Dosi, C. Freeman , R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete, Technical Change and Economic Theory. Londres: Pinter.
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: UNKNO.
dc.relationFreeman, C. F. (1982). TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS. (S. P. Unit, Ed.) Obtenido de ttp://redesist.ie.ufrj.br/globelics/pdfs/GLOBELICS_0079_Freeman.pdf
dc.relationFreeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. doi:tps://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
dc.relationFundación Las Golondrinas. (2021). Presentación Oficial FLG.
dc.relationFundación Nacional Batuta. (05 de Agosto de 2022). fundacion batuta.org. Obtenido de https://www.fundacionbatuta.org/reconciliacion.php
dc.relationGalison, P. (1999). Galison, P. (1999). Trading Zone Coordinating Action and Belief . En M. Biagioli, TheTrading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief (1998 abridgment). En M. Biagioli, The Science Studies Reader (págs. 137-160). New York & London: Routledge. Obtenido de https://galison.scholar.harvard.edu/files/andrewhsmith/files/galison_tradingzonesa bridged.pdf
dc.relationGarrido, F. J. (2001). El análisis de redes en el desarrollo local. En M. Montañés Serrano, T. Rodriguez-Villasante Prieto, & P. M. Martin Gutierrez, Prácticas locales de creatividad social (págs. 67-89). Obtenido de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=838431
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(2004), 897-920. doi:doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445-476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
dc.relationGeorge, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prahhu, J. (2012). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661-683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6486.2012.01048.x
dc.relationGeorge, H. (1904). Progress and poverty (4th ed. ed.). Doubleday Page.
dc.relationGërxhani, K. (2004). The Informal Sector in Developed and Less Developed Countries: A Literature Survey. Public Choice, 120, 267-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000044287.88147.5e
dc.relationGhosh, B., Kivimaa, P., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Torrens, J. (2021). Transformative outcomes: assessing and reorienting experimentation with transformative innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 48, 739-756. doi:ttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab045
dc.relationGomez, H., & Brand, E. (2006). Biblioteca digital UdeA. Obtenido de https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/2542/1/BrandEdinson_analisi sredesmetodologiainvestigacion.pdf
dc.relationGómez, O. D. (Septiembre de 2013). slideshare.net. Obtenido de https://es.slideshare.net/TransparenciaporColombia/contratacin-social
dc.relationGorissen, L., Spira, F., Meynaerts, E., Valkering, P., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2018). Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173(1), 171-185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052
dc.relationGranovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
dc.relationGranovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Obtenido de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
dc.relationGrant, R. M. (1996). TOWARD A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF THE FIRM. Strategic Management Journal, 109-122.
dc.relationGrin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. Routledge.
dc.relationHanneman, R. A. (2005). Using matrices to represent social relations. En R. A. Hanneman, & M. Riddle, Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California.
dc.relationHardwick, J., Anderson , A., & Cruickshank , D. (2013). Trust formation processes in innovative collaborations: networking as knowledge building practices. European journal of innovation management, 16(1), 4-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061311292832
dc.relationHeeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New Models of Inclusive Innovation for Development. Innovation and Development, 175-185.
dc.relationHekkert, M., Janssen, M., Wesseling, J. H., & Negro, S. E. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34(2020), 76-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011
dc.relationHermans, F., Apeldoorn, D. v., Stuiver, M., & Kok, K. (2013). Niches and networks: Explaining network evolution through niche. Research Policy, 42(2013), 613-623. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.004
dc.relationHoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob , D., Taylor, M., Bindi , M., Brown, S., Camilloni , I., . . . Zougmoré , R. (2018). Impacts of 1.5°C of Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. En Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change (págs. 175-311). Obtenido de https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/SR15_Chapter3_Low_Re s.pdf
dc.relationHormecheas, K. (2021). Representación de efectos de políticas de innovación transfromativa en el desempeño sostenible de los sistemas de innovación. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationIbáñez Porras, P. (Julio de 2020). “Redes complejas: descripción, análisis y aplicaciones” . Tesis de Grado en Fisica , Universidad de Salamanca, Facultad de Ciencias, Salamanca. Obtenido de https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/143828/Redes_complejas.pdf;jsessi onid=518A589971E75C224FCCF6AE18E7A7AF?sequence=1
dc.relationLundvall, Bengt-Åke.Interaction, P. I.-P. (1985). (I. D. Series, Ed.) Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Obtenido de https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/7556474/user-producer.pdf
dc.relationIreland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413-446. doi:Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage
dc.relationKemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310
dc.relationking, D. (2016). Biggest opportunity of our age. Science, 351(6269). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1428
dc.relationKivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
dc.relationKivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062-1075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
dc.relationKuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2018). Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448-454. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy011
dc.relationKungl, G., & Geels, F. (2018). Sequence and alignment of external pressures in industry destabilisation: Understanding the downfall of incumbent utilities in the German energy transition (1998–2015). Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 78-100. doi:10.1016/J.EIST.2017.05.003
dc.relationKutz, A., Falco, M., & Giandini, R. (2016). Análisis de redes sociales: Un caso práctico. Computación y Sistemas, 20(1), 89-106. Obtenido de ttps://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=61544821009
dc.relationKuznets, S. (1973). Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 247-258.
dc.relationLeach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Andy, C. S., Adrian, S., . . . Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming Innovation for Sustainability. Ecology & Society, 17(2), 1-6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211
dc.relationLeeuwis, C., Pyburn, R., & Röling, N. G. (2002). Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management : international research and reflections. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
dc.relationLinnarsson, H., & Werr, A. (2004). Overcoming the innovation-alliance paradox: a case study of an explorative alliance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 45-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410515637
dc.relationLoorbach, D., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., Wirth, T. V., & Frantzeskak, N. (2020). Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 251-260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009
dc.relationLozano Pérez, S. (2008). Procesos sociales y Desarrollo Sostenible: Un ámbito de aplicación para el análisis de redes sociales complejas. Revista internacional de Sostenibilidad , Tecnología y Humanismo(3), 59-81. Obtenido de http://hdl.handle.net/2099/7077
dc.relationLundvall, B. (1988). Innovation as and interactive process: From user -producer interaction to the national system of innovation. En G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete, Technical Change and Economic Theory (págs. 349-369). Pisa, Italy: Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM) , Sant Anna School of Advanced Studies.
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (2016). Chapter 2. Product Innovation and User–Producer Interaction. En B.-Å. Lundvall, The Learning Economy and the (pág. 423). London: Anthem Press. Obtenido de https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/31613/626406.pdf#page= 36
dc.relationMacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., & Hillier, J. (2012). Social Innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. En F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, Mehmood Abid, & A. Hamdouch, The international Handbook on social Innovation: Collective action, social learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
dc.relationMarjolein, C. C., & Romijn, H. A. (2008). Actor networks in Strategic Niche Management: Insights from social network theory. Futures, 40(2008), 613-629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.12.005
dc.relationMarkard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability Transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 955-967.
dc.relationMarshall, F., & Dolley, J. (2019). Transformative innovation in peri-urban Asia. Research Policy, 48(4), 983-992. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.007
dc.relationMazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
dc.relationMazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
dc.relationmedellin.gov.co. (2016). www.medellin.gov.co. Obtenido de https://www.medellin.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/pccdesign/medellin/Temas/Presupuest oParticipativo/Publicaciones/Shared%20Content/Publicaciones/2019/Informedeeje cucionano2016.pdf
dc.relationMinisterio del Interior. (2022). mininterior.gov.co. Obtenido de https://www.mininterior.gov.co/organizaciones-de-accion-comunal-oac/
dc.relationMöller, K., & Svahn, S. (2003). Moller, K. & Svahn, S. 2003, 'Strategic Network Management: A Capability Perspective', Marketing Theory, Vol. 3) No. 2, pp. 209- 234. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Newsletter, IEEE ·, 3(2), 201-226. doi:10.1177/14705931030032002
dc.relationMonsalve Granda, C. (10 de Enero de 2014). Barrio de Medellín recibió premio internacional. El Tiempo. Obtenido de https://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-13350279
dc.relationMoulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., Martinelli, F., & Gonzalez, S. (2010). Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849132
dc.relationNadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by Design The Power of Organizational Architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationNan, L. (2001). SOCIAL CAPITAL. A THEORY OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND ACTION. 278. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2002000200010
dc.relationNelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. United States of America: THE BELKNAP PRESS OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS AND LONDON, ENGLAND. Obtenido de http://inctpped.ie.ufrj.br/spiderweb/pdf_2/Dosi_1_An_evolutionary-theory- of_economic_change..pdf
dc.relationNewell, S., & Swan, J. (2000). Trust and inter-organizational networking. Human Relations, 53(10), 1287-1328. doi:10.1177/a014106
dc.relationNicholas Athanassiou, D. N. (1999). The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks: a tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 83-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002
dc.relationNiembro, A. (2021). Desarrollo de los sistemas regionales de innovación y estructura productiva provincial: Un primer análisis de las bases de conocimiento industrial en Argentina. En 71-77, G. Dutrénit, J. M. Natera, A. Torres, J. L. Sampedro, D. Suárez, M. Mattos, . . . M. F. Milia (Edits.), Debates sobre Innovación Políticas, actores e instituciones de ciencia tecnología e Innovación en America Latina (Vol. 6, pág. 318). México: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Maestría en Economía Gestión y Política de Innovación, Latin American Network for Economics for Learning, Innovation and Competence Building Systems.
dc.relationO´Brien, K. L. (2016). Climate change and social transformations: is it time for a quantum leap? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews , 7(5), 618-626. doi:10.1002/wcc.413
dc.relationO'Brien, K., & Selboe, E. (2015). The Adaptive Challenge of Climate Change. U.K: Cambridge University Press
dc.relationOlaya Dávila, A., Gualdrón Gonzalez , O., Rojas Pineda, E., Pontón Silva, J., & Yemail Cortes, U. N. (2018). Green Book 2030. Bogota: COLCIENCIAS. Obtenido de http://libroverde2030.minciencias.gov.co/wp- content/uploads/2018/10/GreenBook2030_8oct-web2.pdf
dc.relationOlsson, P., Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., & McCarthy, D. D. (2017). The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: a new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology & Society, 22(31), 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09310-220231
dc.relationPahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert , E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social Learning and Water Resources Management. Ecology & Society, 12(2), 1- 19. Obtenido de http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/
dc.relationPel, B. (2015). Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 673-691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1090903
dc.relationPérez González, M. d., & Lutsak-Yaroslava, N. V. (2017). La producción científica sobre la innovación social para el desarrollo local. Una revisión bibliométrica. Prisma Social, 19, 146-182. Obtenido de https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/1750
dc.relationQuiceno Toro, N., Muñoz, A. M., & Montoya, H. (2008). Biblioteca digital UdeA. Secretaria de Cultura Ciudadana, Antioquia. Medellín: Proyecto Memoria y Patrimonio. Obtenido de https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4561/6/QuicenoNatalia_2008 _Comuna8MemoriaTerritorio.pdf
dc.relationQuintero Ramirez, S., Ruiz Castañeda, W. L., Giraldo Ramirez, D. P., Velez Acosta, L. M., Marin Sanchez, B. M., Cubillos Jimenez, S., & Cárdenas Garces, A. Y. (2019). Modelo de transferencia de Tecnología para las cadenas productivas agropecuarias: Análisis comparativo de las cadenas del café y el aguacate en Antioquia. Medellín-Colombia: Editorial Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Obtenido de https://repository.upb.edu.co/handle/20.500.11912/4899
dc.relationRaven, R. P. (2005). Strategic Niche Management for Biomass: A ComparativeStudy on the Experimental Introduction of Bioenergy Technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. [Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e /Graduation TU/e), Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. doi:https://doi.org/10.6100/IR590593
dc.relationRaven, R. P. (2007). Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2390-2400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003
dc.relationRaven, R., Van den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: Towards a competence kit for practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 57-74. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2010.033128
dc.relationReyes, H. (2000). La terminología del análisis de redes. Problemas de definición y de traducción. Política y Sociedad, 33(199). Obtenido de https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO0000130199A
dc.relationRio, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. En S. Rayner, & E. L. Malone, Human choice and climate change (págs. 327-399). Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
dc.relationRios Kerguelen, D., Chalela Naffah, S., Echavarría Escobar, S., & Botero Uribe, S. (2021). HOJAS DE RUTA PARA EL FORTALECIMIENTO DEL ECOSISTEMA CTeI desde la perspectiva de misiones transformativas para una Medellin sostenible e inteligete en 2030. (Corporación Centro de Ciencia y Tecnología de Antioquia, Ed.) Medellín. Obtenido de https://cta.org.co/wp- content/uploads/2022/05/CTA_ESTUDIO_DE_CASO_2021_MISIONES_TRANSF ORMATIVAS_A_2030.pdf?
dc.relationRockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone , K., Persson , A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., . . . Foley, J. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 472-475. Obtenido de https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/
dc.relationRogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan , M. M. (2008). Diffusion of Innovations. En D. W. Stacks, & M. B. Salwen, An integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (pág. 17). New York: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011
dc.relationRotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and Transition Management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184-196.
dc.relationRuhnau, B. (2000). Eigenvector-centrality — a node-centrality? Social Networks, 22(4), 357-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00031-9
dc.relationSandberg, J., Holmström, J., Napier, N., & Levén, P. (2015). Balancing diversity in innovation networks: Trading zones in university-industry R&D collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 44-69. doi:10.1108/EJIM-09-2013- 0088
dc.relationSantos Requena, F. (1989). EL CONCEPTO DE RED SOCIAL. Reis, 137-152. Obtenido de https://reis.cis.es//REIS/PDF/REIS_048_08.pdf
dc.relationSchot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5 THE DYNAMICS OF SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION JOURNEYS), 537-554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732080229265
dc.relationSchot, J., & Kanger, L. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabiSchot, J., & Kanger, L. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Research Policy, 47(6), 1045-1059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009
dc.relationSchot, J., & Steinmueller, E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 1554-1567. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
dc.relationSchot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (18 de Octubre de 2016). Tipconsortium. Obtenido de https://tipconsortium.net/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/SchotSteinmueller_FramingsWorkingPaperVersionUpdat ed2018.10.16-New-copy.pdf
dc.relationSchot, J., Boni, A., Ramirez, M., & Steward, F. (s.f.). Tipconsortium.net. Obtenido de https://www.tipconsortium.net/es/publication/addressing-the-sustainable- development-goals-through-transformative-innovation-policy/
dc.relationSecretaria de Cultura Ciudadana -Alcaldia de Medellín y Corporación Cultural Diáfora. (Junio de 2014). www.corporaciondiafora.org. (A. d.-S. Ciudadana, & Corporación Cultural Diáfora, Edits.) Obtenido de https://issuu.com/comuna8medellin/docs/directorio
dc.relationSecretaria de Innovación digital. (Marzo de Marzo de 2021). www.medellin.gov.co. Obtenido de https://www.medellin.gov.co/es/sala-de-prensa/noticias/epm-lanzo- su-segundo-fondo-de-capital-privado-para-invertir-en-innovacion-a-traves-del- programa-ventures/
dc.relationShi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green construction – An empirical study in China. Habitat International, 40(October 2013), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.003
dc.relationSnijders, T. A. (1999). Prologue to the Measurement of Social Capital. The Tocqueville Review, 20(1), 27-44. doi: DOI: 10.3138/ttr.20.1.27
dc.relationStern, N. (2016). Economics: Current climate models are grossly misleading. Nature, 530(7591), 407-409. doi:10.1038/530407a
dc.relationSteward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 331-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
dc.relationStrasser, T., de Traker, J., & Kemp, R. (2019). Developing the Transformative Capacity of Social Innovation through Learning: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for the Roles of Network Leadership. Sustainability, 11(5: 1304), 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051304
dc.relationStrasser, T., Kraker, J., & Kemp, R. (2020). Three Dimensions of Transformative Impact and Capacity: A Conceptual Framework Applied in Social Innovation Practice. Sustainability, 12(4742), 1-40. doi:doi:10.3390/su12114742
dc.relationSuurs, R. A. (2009). Motors of sustainable innovation : Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Utrecht: Utrecht University. Obtenido de https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/33346
dc.relationTalavera, M. (2018). Innovación transformadora: Conceptos básicos y marcos de innovación. México: Foro consultivo científico y tecnológico, AC.
dc.relationThomas, H., Santos, G., Becerra, L., Bortz, G., Brieva, S. S., Ceverio, R., . . . Vercelli, A. (2016). Tecnologías para incluir Ocho análisis socio-técnicos orientados al diseño estrátegico de artefactos y normativas. (U. N. Instituto de Estudios sobre la ciencia y tecnología IESCT, Ed.) Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lenguaje Claro Editora.
dc.relationTrischler, J., Svensson, P. O., Williams, H., & Wikström, F. (2022). Citizens as an innovation source in sustainability transitions – linking the directionality of innovations with the locus of the problem intransformative innovation policy. Public Management Review, 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2062041
dc.relationTSI Foundation. (s.f.). http://tsif.eu/. Obtenido de http://tsif.eu/reads-links/#views-on- social-innovation
dc.relationTurnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime Destabilisation As The Flipside Of Energy Transitions: Lessons From The History Of The British Coal Industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50, 35-49. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060
dc.relationVan der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
dc.relationWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815478
dc.relationWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2009). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationWeber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
dc.relationWorld Vision. (03 de Octubre de 2022). worldvision.co. Obtenido de https://blog.worldvision.co/proyectos_especiales/proyecto-youth-ready-iniciativa- vision-para-j%C3%B3venes-vulnerables
dc.relationYang, H.-X., Wu, Z.-X., & Wang, B.-H. (2010). Role of aspiration-induced migration in cooperation. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 81(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.065101
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleImplicaciones del relacionamiento en la innovación transformativa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución