dc.contributorMartínez Gutiérrez, Diana Carolina
dc.contributorDuque Ropero, David Fernando
dc.contributorPlasticun
dc.creatorBenavides Mazo, Jorge Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T13:57:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T23:37:14Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T13:57:21Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T23:37:14Z
dc.date.created2022-10-25T13:57:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82445
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6651409
dc.description.abstractAntecedentes: Las lesiones del plexo braquial [LPB] causan severos déficits funcionales con implicaciones sustanciales para la salud mental y profundos impactos socioeconómicos. Debido a su común asociación con accidentes en motocicletas, se espera que la incidencia en Latinoamérica sea elevada, pero los datos en nuestra región son escasos. Objetivo: Describir la distribución de las LPB, las características de los pacientes y evaluar los desenlaces clínicos del manejo quirúrgico en adultos atendidos en un hospital de referencia en Colombia. Métodos: Este estudio ambispectivo, descriptivo e inferencial, incluyo pacientes evaluados entre enero de 2015 y junio de 2021. La información se obtuvo de los datos registrados en la historia clínica y la aplicación del cuestionario DASH. Resultados: Se incluyeron 44 pacientes con una edad media de 33 ± 13 años. El 95% hombres. El tiempo de evolución promedio hasta la cirugía fue 13,7 meses. El seguimiento medio fue de 38 ± 19 meses. Los accidentes en motocicleta causaron el 65,9% de todas las LPB. La afección del miembro superior derecho fue más frecuente (56,8%). El 36,4% de los pacientes presentaron politrauma. La LPB completa C5-T1 se observó en el 27,3%, seguida de la lesión alta extendida C5-C7 en el 22,7%. Las neurotizaciones fueron el procedimiento reconstructivo más utilizado. Respecto a los desenlaces clínicos funcionales, arcos de movimiento y fuerza, encontramos una mejoría postquirúrgica estadísticamente significativa en todos los grupos musculares (p < 0,01). Similar, en cuanto a la mejoría en la escala visual análoga de dolor (p < 0,0001). En promedio el 52,6 ± 10,9% de los pacientes alcanzaron una fuerza ≥ M3. La puntuación media del DASH postquirúrgico fue de 49,9 ± 20,8. El retraso en la intervención quirúrgica superior a 6 meses y la presentación de lesiones concomitantes se asociaron significativamente con peor pronóstico funcional, discapacidad y calidad de vida. 66% de los pacientes tuvieron una incapacidad total superior a 180 días, pero sólo un 27,3% cuenta con pensión por invalidez. Sólo 6 casos presentaron complicaciones. Conclusiones Las LPB son frecuentes en nuestro medio, la mayoría ocurren en hombres jóvenes en accidentes en motocicletas, quienes suelen acceder tardíamente a un manejo reconstructivo. A pesar de esto, observamos una mejoría significativa en los desenlaces clínicos de recuperación motora y reducción del dolor. Aunque, la percepción de discapacidad severa y pobre calidad de vida es persistente según lo medido con el DASH, evidencia de la común infravaloración de los desenlaces psicosociales en estos pacientes. Se requieren estudios más amplios y de carácter multicéntrico que corroboren nuestros hallazgos. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brachial plexus injuries [BPI] cause severe functional deficits with substantial mental health implications and profound socioeconomic impacts. Due to their common association with motorcycle accidents, the incidence in Latin America is expected to be high, but data in our region are scarce. Objective: To describe the distribution of the BPI and patient characteristics and evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical management in adults attended at a referral hospital in Colombia. Methods: This ambispective, descriptive and inferential study included patients evaluated between January 2015 and June 2021. Information was obtained from data recorded in the clinical record and the application of the DASH score. Results: 44 patients were included with a mean age of 33 ± 13 years. 95% were male. The mean time to surgery was 13.7 months. Mean follow-up was 38 ± 19 months. Motorcycle accidents caused 65.9% of all BPI. Right upper limb involvement was more frequent (56.8%). Polytrauma was present in 36.4% of patients. Complete BPI (C5-T1) was observed in 27.3%, followed by extended high injury (C5-C7) in 22.7%. Nerve transfer was the most frequently used reconstructive procedure. Regarding functional clinical outcomes, arcs of motion, and strength, we found a statistically significant post-surgical improvement in all muscle groups (p < 0.01). Similar, in terms of improvement in the visual analog scale for pain (p < 0.0001). On average 52.6 ± 10.9% of patients achieved strength ≥ M3. The mean post-surgical DASH score was 49.9 ± 20.8. Delay in surgical intervention longer than 6 months and the presentation of concomitant lesions were significantly associated with worse functional prognosis, disability, and quality of life. 66% of the patients had a long-term disability of more than 180 days, but only 27.3% were retired. Complications were presented in 6 cases. Conclusions: BPI are frequent in our environment, most of them occurring in young men in motorcycle accidents, who usually have late access to reconstructive management. Despite this, we observed a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes of motor recovery and pain reduction. However, the perception of severe disability and poor quality of life is persistent as measured by the DASH score, evidence of the common underestimation of psychosocial outcomes in these patients. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to corroborate our findings.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Cirugía Plástica
dc.publisherDepartamento de Cirugía
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisherBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationBireme
dc.relationRedCol
dc.relationLaReferencia
dc.relationHill JR, Lanier ST, Brogan DM, Dy CJ. Management of Adult Brachial Plexus Injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(9):778-788. doi:10.1016/J.JHSA.2021.05.008
dc.relationNagano A. Treatment of brachial plexus injury. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3(1):71-80. doi:10.1007/S007760050024
dc.relationPark HR, Lee GS, Kim IS, Chang J-C. Brachial Plexus Injury in Adults. The Nerve. 2017;3(1):1-11. doi:10.21129/NERVE.2017.3.1.1
dc.relationYoshikawa T, Hayashi N, Yamamoto S, et al. Brachial plexus injury: Clinical manifestations, conventional imaging findings, and the latest imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2006;26(SPEC. ISS.). doi:10.1148/RG.26SI065511/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/G06OC15G19X.JPEG
dc.relationMoghekar AR, Moghekar AR, Karli N, Chaudhry V. Brachial plexopathies: Etiology, frequency, and electrodiagnostic localization. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2007;9(1):243-247. doi:10.1097/CND.0B013E3181450F7A
dc.relationAkita S, Wada E, Kawai H. Combined injuries of the brachial plexus and spinal cord. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2006;88(5):637-641. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17175/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/17175-2B.JPEG
dc.relationNotices. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(6):489-491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.1040
dc.relationMidha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(6):1182-1189. doi:10.1097/00006123-199706000-00014
dc.relationFlores LP. [Epidemiological study of the traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006;64(1):88-94. doi:10.1590/s0004-282x2006000100018
dc.relationVergara-Amador E. Lesiones altas del plexo braquial. Reconstrucción con técnicas combinadas de neurotización e injertos nerviosos. Rev la Fac Med. 2015;63(1):93-98. doi:10.15446/REVFACMED.V63N1.43406
dc.relationShin AY, Spinner RJ, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT. Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(6):382-396. doi:10.5435/00124635-200510000-00003
dc.relationFerreira SR, Martins RS, Siqueira MG. Correlation between motor function recovery and daily living activity outcomes after brachial plexus surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(9):631-634. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20170090
dc.relationThatte MR, Babhulkar S, Hiremath A. Brachial plexus injury in adults: Diagnosis and surgical treatment strategies. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013;16(1):26. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.107686
dc.relationDy CJ, Garg R, Lee SK, Tow P, Mancuso CA, Wolfe SW. A Systematic Review of Outcomes Reporting for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):308-313. doi:10.1016/J.JHSA.2014.10.033
dc.relationKerr AT. The brachial plexus of nerves in man, the variations in its formation and branches. Am J Anat. 1918;23(2):285-395. doi:10.1002/AJA.1000230205
dc.relationDahlstrom KA, Olinger AB. Descriptive Anatomy of the Interscalene Triangle and the Costoclavicular Space and Their Relationship to Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Study of 60 Cadavers. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2012;35(5):396-401. doi:10.1016/J.JMPT.2012.04.017
dc.relationSkolnik EM, Yee KF, Friedman M, Golden TA. The posterior triangle in radical neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102(1):1-4. doi:10.1001/archotol.1976.00780060047002
dc.relationLanders ZA, Jethanandani R, Lee SK, Mancuso CA, Seehaus M, Wolfe SW. The Psychological Impact of Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(10):950.e1-950.e6. doi:10.1016/J.JHSA.2018.02.019
dc.relationNarakas AO. The treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Int Orthop 1985 91. 1985;9(1):29-36. doi:10.1007/BF00267034
dc.relationSongcharoen P, Wongtrakul S, Spinner RJ. Brachial plexus injuries in the adult. nerve transfers: the Siriraj Hospital experience. Hand Clin. 2005;21(1):83-89. doi:10.1016/J.HCL.2004.10.002
dc.relationMoran SL, Steinmann SP, Shin AY. Adult brachial plexus injuries: mechanism, patterns of injury, and physical diagnosis. Hand Clin. 2005;21(1):13-24. doi:10.1016/J.HCL.2004.09.004
dc.relationTerzis JK, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN. Outcomes of brachial plexus reconstruction in 204 patients with devastating paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(5):1221-1240. doi:10.1097/00006534-199910000-00001
dc.relationSunderland S. The connective tissues of peripheral nerves. Brain. 1965;88(4):841-854. doi:10.1093/brain/88.4.841
dc.relationSunderland S. A CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES PRODUCING LOSS OF FUNCTION. Brain. 1951;74(4):491-516. doi:10.1093/BRAIN/74.4.491
dc.relationFox IK, MacKinnon SE. Adult Peripheral Nerve Disorders—Nerve Entrapment, Repair, Transfer and Brachial Plexus Disorders. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(5). doi:10.1097/PRS.0B013E31820CF556
dc.relationKinlaw D. Pre-/postoperative therapy for adult plexus injury. Hand Clin. 2005;21(1):103-108. doi:10.1016/J.HCL.2004.10.003
dc.relationNoland SS, Bishop AT, Spinner RJ, Shin AY. Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(19):705-716. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00433
dc.relationRankine JJ. Adult traumatic brachial plexus injury. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(9):767-774. doi:10.1016/J.CRAD.2004.03.014
dc.relationRobla-Costales J, Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, et al. Técnicas de reconstrucción nerviosa en cirugía del plexo braquial traumatizado (Parte 1): Transferencias nerviosas extraplexuales . Neurocir . 2011;22:507-520.
dc.relationMerrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW. Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(2):303-314. doi:10.1053/JHSU.2001.21518
dc.relationSongcharoen P. Management of brachial plexus injury in adults. Scand J Surg. 2008;97(4):317-323. doi:10.1177/145749690809700408
dc.relationGu YD, Chen DS, Zhang GM, et al. Long-term functional results of contralateral C7 transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1998;14(1):57-59. doi:10.1055/S-2007-1006902/BIB
dc.relationRobla-Costales J, Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, et al. Técnicas de reconstrucción nerviosa en cirugía del plexo braquial traumatizado (Parte 2): Transferencias nerviosas intraplexuales . Neurocir . 2011;22:521-534.
dc.relationGu YD, Cai PQ, Xu F, Peng F, Chen L. Clinical application of ipsilateral C7 nerve root transfer for treatment of C5 and C6 avulsion of brachial plexus. Microsurgery. 2003;23(2):105-108. doi:10.1002/MICR.10113
dc.relationOberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ. Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5–C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: Anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(2):232-237. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90011-6
dc.relationSungpet A, Suphachatwong C, Kawinwonggowit V, Patradul A. TRANSFER OF A SINGLE FASCICLE FROM THE ULNAR NERVE TO THE BICEPS MUSCLE AFTER AVULSIONS OF UPPER ROOTS OF THE BRACHIAL PLEXUS. J Hand Surg Br Eur Vol. 2000;25(4):325-328. doi:10.1054/JHSB.2000.0367
dc.relationTung TH, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers to the biceps and brachialis branches to improve elbow flexion strength after brachial plexus injuries. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(2):313-318. doi:10.3171/JNS.2003.98.2.0313
dc.relationLeechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul P. Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: a report of 7 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(4):633-638. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(03)00199-0
dc.relationNath RK, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers in the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2000;16(1):131-139, ix. doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000373
dc.relationQuick TJ, Brown H. Evaluation of functional outcomes after brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020;45(1):28-33. doi:10.1177/1753193419879645
dc.relationGarcía González LA, Aguilar Sierra FJ, Moreno Serrano C, Enciso M. Traduccion, adaptacion cultural y validacion de una escala de funcion del miembro superior: DASH. Rev Colomb Ortop y Traumatol. 2020;34(3):231-240. doi:10.1016/J.RCCOT.2017.06.011
dc.relationAhmed-Labib M, Golan JD, Jacques L. Functional outcome of brachial plexus reconstruction after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5):1013-1016. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000303197.87672.31
dc.relationHill BE, Williams G, Bialocerkowski AE. Clinimetric evaluation of questionnaires used to assess activity after traumatic brachial plexus injury in adults: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(12):2082-2089. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.188
dc.relationSuroto H, Antoni I, Siyo A, et al. Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury in Indonesia: An Experience from a Developing Country. J Reconstr Microsurg. Published online 2021. doi:10.1055/S-0041-1735507/ID/JR210070-25
dc.relationKaiser R, Mencl L, Haninec P. Injuries associated with serious brachial plexus involvement in polytrauma among patients requiring surgical repair. Injury. 2014;45(1):223-226. doi:10.1016/J.INJURY.2012.05.013
dc.relationBertelli JA, Ghizoni MF, Soldado F. Patterns of Brachial Plexus Stretch Palsy in a Prospective Series of 565 Surgically Treated Patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(6):443-446.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.021
dc.relationKaiser R, Waldauf P, Ullas G, Krajcová A. Epidemiology, etiology, and types of severe adult brachial plexus injuries requiring surgical repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2018 432. 2018;43(2):443-452. doi:10.1007/S10143-018-1009-2
dc.relationMartin E, Senders JT, DiRisio AC, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(4):1333-1345. doi:10.3171/2018.1.JNS172068
dc.relationLi GY, Xue MQ, Wang JW, Zeng XY, Qin J, Sha K. Traumatic brachial plexus injury: a study of 510 surgical cases from multicenter services in Guangxi, China. Acta Neurochir 2019 1615. 2019;161(5):899-906. doi:10.1007/S00701-019-03871-Y
dc.relationMackinnon SE. Future Perspectives in the Management of Nerve Injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34(9):672-674. doi:10.1055/S-0038-1639353/ID/JR180037-16
dc.relationGarg R, Merrell GA, Hillstrom HJ, Wolfe SW. Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: A systematic review and analysis. J Bone Jt Surg. 2011;93(9):819-829. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01602
dc.relationAyhan E, Soldado F, Fontecha CG, Bertelli JA, Leblebicioglu G. Elbow flexion reconstruction with nerve transfer or grafting in patients with brachial plexus injuries: A systematic review and comparison study. Microsurgery. 2020;40(1):79-86. doi:10.1002/MICR.30440
dc.relationRasulić L, Savić A, Živković B, et al. Outcome after brachial plexus injury surgery and impact on quality of life. Acta Neurochir 2017 1597. 2017;159(7):1257-1264. doi:10.1007/S00701-017-3205-1
dc.relationGillis JA, Khouri JS, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Outcomes of elbow flexion reconstruction in patients older than 50 with traumatic brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):151-158. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005094
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleExperiencia en el manejo quirúrgico de las lesiones de plexo braquial en un hospital de IV nivel en Latinoamérica
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médica


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución