dc.creatorAcosta Restrepo, Patricia
dc.creatorGómez-García, Clara Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T17:55:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T14:19:23Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T17:55:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T14:19:23Z
dc.date.created2023-01-30T17:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-30
dc.identifierElusive urban - regional governance : the sustainable development challenge of megacities in Latin America. Serie de Documentos de Trabajo FEIPU, ISSNe: 2745-2085, No. 6. Bogotá : Universidad del Rosario. Facultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos, 2021 ; # pp.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.12804/issne.2745-2085_10336.37999_feipu
dc.identifier2745-2085
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37999
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6649322
dc.description.abstractFour of the world’s megacities have consolidated in the Latin American (LatAm) region: Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Buenos Aires, while there are two more in the process: Lima and Bogota. These big urban agglomerations are not only essential national economic engines of major demographic significance; but have extended into city-regions which embody the most acute development challenges: environmental degradation, resource inefficiency, social exclusion, income inequality, impoverishment, insecurity, violence, social and economic vulnerability to climate change, and corresponding liveability concerns. In brief, LatAm’s megacities are dealing with the cumulative impacts and feedback loops of long-neglected mega-problems. This paper explores the strategies or institutional arrangements used to face these cities and city-regions’ development issues and the governance practices implicit in different approaches used to manage key sectors. A review of existing comparative studies and cases, complemented by several interviews with local experts, suggests that specific political, administrative, and legal national contexts greatly define the options to formally approach these challenges at an appropriate geographic scale. However, our analysis highlights three issues for overcoming political and institutional hurdles, which hamper integrated planning, coordinated policies and investments at the megacity scale, and the limited implementation of formal, integrated management schemes, such as metropolitan areas, to address problems across and beyond metropolises effectively. The evaluation suggests both situations have promoted the emergence of alternate, sometimes informal, parallel network governance arrangements amongst a diversity of stakeholders.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos
dc.relationSerie de documentos de trabajo FEIPU
dc.relationSerie de documentos de trabajo FEIPU, ISSNe: 2745-2085, No. 6 (enero de 2023) 47 pp
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceAcosta, P. (2010). The Bogota-Sabana region: The political economy behind the struggle to implement a sustainable urban development model. Documentos de investigación de Ekística. https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_3817
dc.sourceBatakis, S., & Narodowski, P. (2022) Argentina: las dificultades para avanzar en la agenda metropolitana. In M. Costa, L. Lui, & S. Rebello (Eds.), Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina: un panorama de las experiencias contemporáneas desde una perspectiva comparada (pp. 25-48). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (cepal).
dc.sourceCamagni, R. (2007). Territorial development policies in the European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp.129-144). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
dc.sourceChatterjee, I. (2011). Governance as ‘performed,’ governance as ‘inscribed’: New urban politics in Ahmedabad. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2571-2590.
dc.sourceCiudadanos con Visión. (2016). Acuerdos para la movilidad en la zona metropolitana del valle de México. https://wriciudades.org/research/ publication/acuerdos-para-la-movilidad-en-la-zona-metropolitana-delvalle- de-m%C3%A9xico
dc.sourceCorreia, A. F., & Sampaio, R. (2017). The emergence of metropolitan areas as a new form of interfederative governance: A comparative study of Aix-Marseille-Provence and the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy, 2(1).
dc.sourceCosta, M., & Lui, L. (2022). Áreas metropolitanas en Latinoamérica: condiciones de gobernanza y sus retos. In M. Costa, L. Lui, & S. Rebello (Eds.), Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina: un panorama de las experiencias contemporáneas desde una perspectiva comparada (pp. 9-24). cepal.
dc.sourceDammert-Guardia, M. (2022). Lima metropolitana: competencia, coordinación y fragmentación institucional. In: M. Costa, L. Lui, & S. Rebello (Eds.), Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina: un panorama de las experiencias contemporáneas desde una perspectiva comparada (pp. 243-280). cepal.
dc.sourceEghrari, S. (2011). Metropolitan Regions in Brazil: Institutional Arrangements and Innovative Experiences. Conference Paper. Third World Planning Schools Congress, Universidade de Brasília(UnB), Brasília, Brazil. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/271328399_Metropolitan_Regions_ in_Brazil_Institutional_Arrangements_and_Innovative_Experiences_ Metropolitan_Regions_in_Brazil_Institutional_Arrangements_and_Innovative_ Experiences
dc.sourceFawaz, M. (2016). Informality as a exception: Case studies from Beirut. In A. Deboulet (Ed.), Rethinking precarious neighborhoods (pp. 87-104). Agence Française de Développement.
dc.sourceFrey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (2001). Metropolitan governance for the future: Functional overlapping competing jurisdictions. Swiss Political Science Review, 7, 124-130.
dc.sourceFrey, K. (2014). Regional governance in Latin America. A comparative perspective. Presented in ipsa 23rd World Congress of Political Scienc, July, Quebec, Canada.
dc.sourceGilbert, A. (1995). The Latin American mega-city: An introduction. United Nations University. https://archive.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/ uu23me/uu23me03.htm#what%20is%20a%20mega%20city
dc.sourceGilbert, A., & United Nations University. (1996). The mega-city in Latin America. United Nations University Press. https://archive.unu.edu/ unupress/unupbooks/uu23me/uu23me00.htm
dc.sourceHoshino, C., & Catano, E. (2020). Documento ejecutivo. La Gobernanza de la Región Metropolitana Bogotá-Cundinamarca en un marco de gobernanza multi-nivel y planificación multi-escalar [Unpublished institutional document].
dc.sourceInstitute of Landscape Planning and Ecology [ilpe]. (2014) Lima ecological infrastructure strategy. Integrated urban planning and design tools for a water scarce city. University of Stuttgart. https://issuu.com/ilpe/docs/ lima_ecological_infrastructure_stra_9c435aba38df2f
dc.sourceKim, J. (2006). Networks, network governance, and networked networks. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 19-34. https://www. alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/02-kim-junki.pdf
dc.sourceKlink, J. (2010). A construção de novas governanças para as áreas metropolitanas: o cenário brasileiro. In Magalhaes, F. (Ed), Regiões Metropolitanas no Brasil: um paradoxo de desafios e oportunidades (pp. 99-122). Interamerican Development Bank.
dc.sourceLabbé, D., & Sorensen, A. (2020). Handbook on megacities and megacityregions. Research handbooks in urban studies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.sourceLambert, R. (2021). Land trafficking and the fertile spaces of legality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(1), 21-38. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12975
dc.sourceLanfranchi, G. (2022). The challenging evolution of integrated governance in metropolitan Buenos Aires. In A. Trejo, & J. Niño (Eds), Metropolitan governance in Latin America (pp. 121-144). Regional Studies Association – Routledge.
dc.sourceLefevre, C. (2005). Gobernabilidad democrática de las áreas metropolitanas. Experiencias y lecciones internacionales para las ciudades latinoamericanas. In E. Rojas, J. Cuadrado-Roura & J. Fernández (Eds.), Gobernar las metrópolis (pp. 195-263). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
dc.sourceLiWa. (2014). Sustainable water and wastewater management in urban growth centres coping with climate change - concepts for Lima metropolitana (Peru) - (LiWa). https://www.lima-water.de/en/index.html
dc.sourceMagalhaes, F. (2010). Introdução. Regiões metropolitanas no Brasil: um paradoxo de desafios e oportunidades. In Magalhaes, F. (Ed), Regiões Metropolitanas no Brasil: um paradoxo de desafios e oportunidades (pp. xi-xixx). Interamerican Development Bank.
dc.sourceMartinez, S., Kralish, S., Escolero, O., & Perecochicova, M. (2015). Vulnerability of Mexico City’s water supply sources in the context of climate change. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6(3), 518-533. https://doi. org/10.2166/wcc.2015.083
dc.sourceNunes, B., & Moura, H. (2013) Imaginário urbano e conjuntura no Rio de Janeiro. Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 5(1), 91-105.
dc.sourceMatela, I. P. (2017). Transport management: The renovation of the Road Pact. In L. de Queiroz Ribeiro (Eds.), Urban transformations in Rio de Janeiro. The Latin American studies book series. Springer, Cham.
dc.sourceMontero,S. (2020) Documento ejecutivo. Hechos Regionales, Hechos Metropolitanos, Hechos Sub-regionales Bogotá-Cundinamarca. Non published Institutional document.
dc.sourceMontoya, J. (2021). Sistemas urbanos y globalización, el estado actual de la red de ciudades en América Latina y el Caribe. In F. Maturana, & J. Montoya (Eds.), Sistemas urbanos en América Latina, el Caribe y Estados Unidos (pp. 27-60). Universidad Alberto Hurtado & Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.sourcePires, V., & Gaeta, A. (2010). El gobierno de las megalopolis, el caso de Brasil – Sao Paulo: gestión metropolitana, descentralización y participación como desafíos simultáneos. Política y Sociedad, 47(3), 187-205.
dc.sourcePradilla, E. (2005). Metropolitan area un the Mexico Valley: Megacity without planning. Ciudades, 9, 83-104.
dc.sourcePradilla, E., & Márquez, L. (2008). Presente y futuro de las metrópolis de América Latina. Territorios, 18-19, 147-181.
dc.sourceProvan, K., & Kenis,P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
dc.sourceRojas, E. (2010). Governança de regiões metropolitanas da América Latina. In F. Magalhaes (Ed), Regiões metropolitanas no Brasil: um paradoxo de desafios e oportunidades (pp. 99-122). Interamerican Development Bank.
dc.sourceRosan, C. (2016). Governing the fragmented metropolis. Planning for regional sustainability. University of Pennsylvania Press.
dc.sourceRoy, A. (2011). Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223-238.
dc.sourceSchafran, A. (2015). Beyond globalization: a historical urban development approach to understanding megaregions. In M. Hoyler & J. Harrison (Eds.), Megaregions: Globalization’s new urban form? (pp. 75-96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.sourceSigler, T., Neal, Z., & Martinus, K. (2022). Brokerage as an urban and regional process between systems and scales. Regional Studies, 2-6.
dc.sourceda Silva, A. C. P. (2017). Governanças cooperativas sustentáveis na gestão metropolitana fluminense: desafios geográficos. Geo uerj. https://doi. org/10.12957/geouerj.2017.32065
dc.sourceStiglich, M., & Vásquez, M. (2022). Governance structures ant the unequal provision of services in metropolitan Lima. In A. Trejo, & J. Niño (Eds), Metropolitan governance in Latin America (pp. 71-94). Regional Studies Association – Routledge.
dc.sourceTrejo, A. (2022). Fragmented governance, service provision and inequality in Mexico City Metropolitan Area. In A. Trejo, & J. Niño (Eds), Metropolitan governance in Latin America (pp. 95-120). Regional Studies Association – Routledge.
dc.sourceTrejo, A., Niño, J. (2022). Introduction. In Authors, Metropolitan governance in Latin America (pp. 3-2). Regional Studies Association – Routledge.
dc.sourceUnited Nations. (2022). Goals 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
dc.sourceUrani, A. (2010). O papel do setor privado e da sociedade civil nas novas governanças metropolitanas brasileiras. In Magalhaes, F. (Ed), Regiões Metropolitanas no Brasil: um paradoxo de desafios e oportunidades (pp. 123-168). Interamerican Development Bank.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectMegaciudad
dc.subjectBogotá
dc.subjectBuenos Aires
dc.subjectCiudad de México
dc.subjectRío de Janeiro
dc.subjectSao Paulo
dc.subjectLima
dc.subjectDesarrollo sostenible
dc.subjectGobernancia
dc.subjectMegaciudad-región
dc.subjectCiudad-región
dc.subjectMegaciudades
dc.subjectProblemas sociales
dc.subjectProblemas ambientales
dc.titleElusive Urban - Regional Governance: The Sustainable Development Challenge of Megacities in Latin America
dc.typeworkingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución