dc.creatorVizioli Libório, Flávia Heloisa
dc.creatorAraújo Bortoleto, Ludmila
dc.creatorInglesis Barcellos , Ekaterina Emmanuil
dc.creatorBotura Jr, Galdenoro
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-01 11:04:50
dc.date.available2023-07-01 11:04:50
dc.date.created2023-07-01 11:04:50
dc.date.issued2023-07-01
dc.identifier10.14718/RevArq.2023.25.4597
dc.identifier2357-626X
dc.identifier1657-0308
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2023.25.4597
dc.description.abstractEl trabajo en casa se ha convertido en rutina en la vida cotidiana de la sociedad global como resultado de la pandemia de covid-19. En el nuevo contexto, la vida familiar y los espacios de vida tuvieron que adaptarse para actividades remotas en línea. Inicialmente positiva, esta modalidad fue impactada por el ambiente y    la ergonomía inadecuadas, afectando la salud física y mental de los individuos, causando ansiedad, inseguridad sobre los objetivos y metas a alcanzar y, consecuentemente, reduciendo la satisfacción inicial y presentando oscilaciones de productividad. Basado en investigaciones realizadas con usuarios de home office, este artículo analiza la percepción de estos individuos sobre la productividad obtenida en los espacios adaptados y estoy seguro de que la visión sobre la constitución de este lugar de trabajo no corresponde a lo que la literatura recomienda como agradable y productivo. Como resultado de la investigación, el artículo presenta una forma de mejorar y aumentar la productividad y la salud de sus usuarios, y propone pautas para el desarrollo de proyectos y adaptaciones de entornos residenciales para home office, basados en los conceptos de neuro arquitectura, ergonomía física y cognitiva, diseño biofílico y experiencia de usuario (UX). La aplicación de las directrices propuestas permitirá crear un entorno saludable, productivo y adecuado para el bienestar de quienes lo utilizan.
dc.description.abstractHome office work has become routine in global society daily life as a result of the pandemic. In the new context, family living and living spaces had to be adapted for online remote activities. Initially positive, this modality was impacted by inadequate ergonomics and environment, and by anxiety and insecurity regarding the objectives and goals to be achieved, affecting physical and mental health, resulting in a consequent decrease in initial satisfaction and productivity fluctuations. Based on research carried out with home office users, this article analyzes the perception of these individuals about the productivity obtained in the adapted spaces. It demonstrates that the view on the constitution of this workplace does not correspond to what the literature recommends as pleasant and productive. As a result of the research, the article presents a way to improve and increase the productivity and health of its users, and proposes guidelines for the development of projects and adaptations of residential environments for home office, based on the concepts of neuroarchitecture, physical ergonomics and cognitive, biophilic design and user experience (UX). The application of the proposed guidelines will make it possible to create a healthy, productive environment suitable for the well-being of those who use it.
dc.language
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4597/4618
dc.relationNúm. 2 , Año 2023 : julio-diciembre
dc.relation2
dc.relation25
dc.relationRevista de Arquitectura (Bogotá)
dc.relationAlexandre, N. M. C. & Coluci, M. Z. O. (2011). Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16, 3061-3068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
dc.relationAssociação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (2020). Acessibilidade a edificações, mobiliário, espaços e equipamentos urbanos. ABNT/NBR 9050:2020. https://www.canoas.rs.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/norma-abnt-NBR-9050-2015-emenda-1-2020.pdf
dc.relationAzzazy, S., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Naismith, N. & Doborjeh, Z. (2021). A critical review on the impact of built environment on users’ measured brain ac-tivity. Architectural Science Review, 64(4), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1749980
dc.relationBarros, A. (2020, 31 jul.).Trabalho remoto cai pela primeira vez com flexibilização do dis-tanciamento social. Agência IBGE Notícias. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/28417-trabalho-remoto-cai-pela-primeira-vez-com-flexibilizacao-do-distanciamento-social
dc.relationBower, I., Tucker, R. & Enticott, P. G. (2019). Impact of built environment design on emo-tion measured via neurophysiological correlates and subjective indicators: A sys-tematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp
dc.relationBragança, P. A. C. D. F. & Marcos, C. (2014). Conforto ambiental — Iluminação, cores, ergo-nomia, paisagismo e critérios para projetos. Editora Saraiva.
dc.relationBrant, R. & Mourão, H. C. (2020). Desafios do teletrabalho na pandemia covid-19: quando o home vira office. Caderno de Administração, 28, Edição E, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.4025/cadadm.v28i0.53637
dc.relationChoi, Y., Kim, M. & Chun, C. (2015). Measurement of occupants’ stress based on electro-encephalograms (EEG) in twelve combined environments. Building and Environ-ment, 88, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.003
dc.relationCosta, L. V. (2013). Construction and validation of a scale of perception of success in ca-reer. Careers and People Magazine (ReCaPe), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20503/recape.v3i1.15435
dc.relationEberhard, J. P. (2009a). Brain landscape: The coexistence of neuroscience and architecture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331721.001.0001
dc.relationEberhard, J. P. (2009b). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62(6), 753-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001
dc.relationEpstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environ-ment. Nature, 392(6676), 598-601. https://doi.org/10.1038/33402
dc.relationEpstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D. & Kanwisher, N. (1999). Neuron. The parahippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron, 23(1), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80758-8
dc.relationGage, F. H. (2003, 8-10 maio). Neuroscience and architecture. Em AIA Convention. San Diego, Califórnia: AIA. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00612.2002
dc.relationGondim, S. & Borges, L. O. (2020). Significados e sentidos do trabalho do home-office: desafios para a regulação emocional. SBPOT, Temática, 5. http://emotrab.ufba.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SBPOT_TEMATICA_5_Gondim_Borges.pdf
dc.relationGrinde, B. & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International journal of environmental research and public health, 6(9), 2332-2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332
dc.relationGuérin, F., Kerguelen, A., Laville, A., Daniellou, F. & Duraffourg, J. (2001). Compreender o trabalho para transformá-lo: a prática da ergonomia. Edgar Blucher.
dc.relationInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2010). Censo Demográfico. Trabalho e Ren-dimento. https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/apps/mapa/
dc.relationInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2021). Desocupação, renda, afastamentos, trabalho remoto e outros efeitos da pandemia no trabalho. http://covid19.ibge.gov.br/pnad-covid/trabalho.php
dc.relationKarakas, T. & Yildiz, D. (2020). Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review. Frontiers of Ar-chitectural Research, 9(1), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.005
dc.relationKellert, S. R. (2012). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature con-nection. Island press.
dc.relationKellert, S. R. & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright LLC. https://biophilicdesign.umn.edu/sites/biophilic-net-positive.umn.edu/files/2021-09/2015_Kellert%20_The_Practice_of_Biophilic_Design.pdf
dc.relationLiu, J., Chen, Q. & Dang, J. (2021). Examining risk factors related to digital learning and social isolation: Youth visual acuity in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Global Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.7189%2Fjogh.11.05020
dc.relationMager, G. B. & Merino, E. (2012). A contribuição da ergonomia no design de home offices. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/1839
dc.relationMarinho, M., Libório, F. H. V. & Paschoarelli, L. C. (2021). Percepção de usuários de home office — Análises das demandas ergonômicas e recomendações para o design. Em: W. J. Jorge & I. P. de Souza, (orgs.), Ciências humanas, sociais e suas tecnologi-as: percepções teóricas e aplicações. [E-book, pp. 8-19]. Uniedusul. http://dx.doi.org/10.51324/86010718.1
dc.relationMendes, D. C., Hastenreiter Filho, H. N. & Tellechea, J. (2020). A realidade do trabalho ho-me office na atipicidade pandêmica. Revista Valore, 5, 160-191. https://revistavalore.emnuvens.com.br/valore/article/view/655
dc.relationNeufert, E. (2013). Arte de projetar em arquitetura. (B. Franco, trad.; 18ª ed.). Gustavo Gili. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7278709/mod_resource/content/1/Neufert%20extrato.pdf
dc.relationOgata, A. J. N, Pinto, A. C., Pereira, V. S., Lourenço, V., Andrade, Y. & Malik, A. M. (2020). Relatório técnico I — Impacto na saúde e no bem-estar do trabalho em regime de home-office durante a pandemia de SARS-COVID-19. https://www.impacto.blog.br/site/wp-content/uploads /2020/08/relatorio-tecnico_saude-e-bem-estar-home-office_gv-saude_i_Ao.pdf
dc.relationPaschoarelli, L. C. & Silva, J. C. P. (2006). Design ergonômico: uma revisão dos seus as-pectos metodológicos. Conexão-Comunicação e Cultura, 5(10). http://www.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/conexao/article/view/223/214
dc.relationPallasmaa, J. (2009). Os olhos da pele: a arquitetura e os sentidos. Artmed Editora.
dc.relationRocha, R. (2020). Home office afeta saúde mental de 4 em cada 10 funcionários. O Tem-po. https://www.otempo.com.br/economia/home-office-afeta-saude-mental-de-4-em-cada-10-funcionarios-1.2415541
dc.relationSegerstrom, S. C. & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune sys-tem: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601
dc.relationSilva, V. L. A. & Bormio, M. F. (2016). A importância do uso ergonômico da cor na interface ambiente x usuário. Em 1º Congresso Internacional de Ergonomia Aplicada. Blu-cher Engineering Proceedings, 3(3), 666-673. https://www.proceedings.blucher.com.br/article-details/a-importncia-do-uso-ergonmico-da-cor-na-interface-ambiente-x-usurio-25094
dc.relationSolís, A. M. E. & Herrera, N. L. R. (2017). El espacio físico y la mente: Reflexión sobre la neuroarquitectura. Cuadernos de Arquitectura, 7(7), 41-47. http://cuadernos.uanl.mx/pdf/num7/CUADERNOS_2017_FULL.pdf
dc.relationTham, K. W. & Willem, H. C. (2010). Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness. Building and Environment, 45(1), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.002
dc.relationThe Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air conditioning Associations (REHVA) (2006). Rheva Guide, 6. https://www.rehva.eu/fileadmin/Promotional_material/Brochures/REHVA_new_brochure_04.03.2015.pdf
dc.relationTripi, S. & Mattei, G. (2020). COVID-19 and Public Administration: Implications of smart working for management and workers’ mental health. DEMB Working Paper Series, 171. Unimore. http://155.185.68.2/wpdemb/0171.pdf
dc.relationVillarouco, V. & Andreto, L. F. M. (2008). Avaliando desempenho de espaços de trabalho sob o enfoque da ergonomia do ambiente construído. Prod., 18(3), 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132008000300009
dc.relationXiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. & Roll, S. C. (2021). Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(3), 181. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FJOM.0000000000002097
dc.relationZarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S. & Hosseini, S. (2021). COVID-19 e as preferências de um lar sau-dável: o caso de residentes de apartamentos em Teerã. Journal of Building Engi-neering, 35, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102021
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.rightsFlávia Heloisa , Bortoleto Ludmila Araújo, Barcellos Ekaterina Emmanuil Inglesis , Galdenoro Botura Jr - 2023
dc.sourcehttps://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4597
dc.subjectHome office ergonomic design
dc.subjectNeuroarchitecture
dc.subjectBiophilic design
dc.subjectHealth at home office
dc.subjectHome office productivity
dc.subjectProjeto ergonômico do home office
dc.subjectNeuroarquitetura
dc.subjectDesign biofílico
dc.subjectSaúde no home office
dc.subjectProdutividade em home office
dc.subjectdiseño ergonómico de la oficina en casa
dc.subjectneuroarquitectura
dc.subjectdiseño biofílico
dc.subjectsalud en la oficina en casa
dc.subjectproductividad en la oficina en casa
dc.titleNeuroarquitectura y Diseño en la oficina en casa: pautas para proyectos y adaptaciones del espacio de trabajo
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución