masterThesis
The use of lateral thinking puzzles to improve opinion paragraph writing. : thinking puzzles to unpuzzle thinking
Fecha
2013-05-23Registro en:
ASPEN, (2008). ASPAEN language arts core document ALAC
Bartl, A. ( 2004). 101 Quick thinking games and riddles for children. Publishers group west.
Bean, J. (2001). Engaging ideas: the professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking,
and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Brink-Budgen, R. (2000). Critical thinking for students: learn the skills of critical assessment
and effective argument. Begbroad, Oxford: How to books.
Brown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson
education.
Browne, N. & Keeley, S. (2007). Asking the right questions: a guide to critical thinking. New
Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research fro English language teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric cross-cultural aspects of second language writing.
Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crist, P. & Scaffa, M. (2004). Best practices in occupational therapy education. Haworth Press.
Damron and High (2008). Enhancing writing and critical thinking through paired courses.
Ferrance, E. (2006). Action research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory,
Brown University: Rhode Island.
Ferris, D. R (2002). Treatment of error in second language writing. USA: The University of
Michigan Press.
Jaffar, S. Teaching critical thinking through literature. Journal of research, 2004, vol. 5.
Hakes, B. (2008). When critical thinking met English literature: A resource book for teachers
and their students. Begbroad, Oxford: How to books.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of the English language teaching. England: Pearson,
Longman.
Hatcher, (1995).
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and teach
all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
Hertz (1992) in Zaphiris & Zacharia. (2006). User-centered computer aided language learning.
British Cataloguing in Publication Data
Hopkins, D. (2008). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Open University Press.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Great Britain: Pearson education
Lucas, R. (2007). Creative learning: activities and games that really engage people. San
Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Mason, M. (2008). Critical thinking and learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Mills, E. (2007). Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher. New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Norton, L.S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting
pedagogical research in universities. Routledge Education.
(Quitadamo, I. & Kurtz, M. (2006). Learning to improve: Using Writing to Increase
Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology. Life Sciences Education Journal.
Vol. 6, 140–154, Summer 2007
Richards, J. (1997). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Richards, K., Stillson, A., Recamán, B. et al. (2002). Classic brain teasers. New York: Sterling
Publishing.
Sagor, R (2005). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school
teams. United Sates of America: Corwin Press
Schmidt, R. & Ma, W. (2006). 50 Literacy strategies for culturally responsive teaching K-8.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Scriven and Richard, (1997). A working definition for critical thinking. Retrieved
Stapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: rethinking tired
constructs. ELT Journal 56(3), 250-257.
Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association
Strauss, A. C. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures
and Techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wallace, (2007). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Williams, M & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
129251
TE01321
Autor
Lytvychenko, Valeriya
Institución
Resumen
Este estudio examina los efectos y beneficios del desarrollo de las habilidades de pensamiento crítico en el mejoramiento de la escritura en la composición de ensayos argumentativos. La investigación fue realizada con un grupo de 23 estudiantes de un colegio de Bogotá. La producción escrita fue analizada teniendo en cuenta los efectos que tuvieron las actividades conocidas como desafíos mentales (brain teasers) en el mejoramiento de las habilidades comunicativas en forma escrita. El estudió se enfocó en el proceso que siguieron las estudiantes con el fin de optimizar su rendimiento. Se concluyó que los desafíos mencionados influyeron en forma positiva y exitosa en el mejoramiento de las habilidades de escritura y motivación de las estudiantes por la escritura.
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Think tanks e universidades no Brasil : análise das relações na produção de conhecimento em política pública
Secchi, Leonardo; Ito, Letícia Elena -
Efecto de la estrategia metacognitiva TWA (think before reading, think while reading, think after reading) en el fortalecimiento de la lectura crítica
Rueda Villanova, Lizbana; Gutiérrez Torres, Yeinis Paola -
Design Thinking na Educação Ambiental: a problemática do Eucalyptus Urophylla S.T. Blake em uma escola do extremo sul baiano
Carvalho Lima, Eli Shuab; Santos Oliveira, Ageu; Suelen Caduda dos Santos , Sindiany