dc.creatorUniversidad San Sebastián
dc.creatorUniversidad San Sebastián
dc.creatorUniversidad San Sebastián
dc.creatorCortes, Hector Monardes
dc.creatorAntunez, Marcia
dc.creatorHerrera, Pamela
dc.creatorJara, Pablo
dc.creatorSteinfort, Karin
dc.creatorAbarca, Jaime
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T05:00:09Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T05:00:09Z
dc.date.created2023-05-24T05:00:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier1121-4171
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uss.cl/handle/uss/7146
dc.identifier10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23
dc.description.abstractAim: To assess the bacterial leakage of two bioceramic sealers and compare them to an epoxy resin-based sealer. Methodology: A sample of 94 one-rooted premolars was obtained and separated into three experimental groups of 30 teeth; two samples were used for negative controls and two for positive controls. The experimental groups were obturated using the hydraulic compaction technique: Group 1 AH Plus® sealer, Group 2 Bioroot® RCS and Group 3 TotalFill® BC Sealer. The teeth were mounted on bacterial leakage devices and incubated at 37 °C for 30 days in a bilin esculin agar culture with Enterococcus Faecalis. Results: Leakage occurred in 27 roots (30%) of the entire sample. Group 1 (AH® Plus) showed the highest percentage of leaked samples (40%) and also took the least average days to leak (16,9) compared to Bioroot® (19,7) and TotalFill® (19,5), but the differences found were not significant (p>0,05). Conclusions: None of the sealers analyzed in this study produced an effective apical seal in which no bacterial leakage occurred. A third of the total sample presented leakage, but the differences between groups were not significant.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationGiornale Italiano di Endodonzia
dc.titleBacterial leakage assessment of bioceramic sealers
dc.typeArtículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución