dc.creatorGuerrero, Maribel
dc.creatorHerrera, Fernando
dc.creatorUrbano, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T13:38:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T14:54:38Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T13:38:46Z
dc.date.available2023-05-19T14:54:38Z
dc.date.created2020-04-01T13:38:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierManagement Decision, Vol. 57 No. 12, pp. 3280-3300
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11447/3191
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1126
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6303914
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This paper analyses how collaborative/opportunistic behaviours subsidised universityindustry partnerships are influencing the design/implementation of strategic knowledge management practices in emerging economies. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed conceptual model was analysed with a retrospective multiple case study approach integrated by four subsidised entrepreneurial universities-industry partnerships of the Incentive Programme for Innovation from 2009 to 2014 in Mexico. Findings: Entrepreneurial universities and industrial organisations confirm insights about dual collaborative-opportunistic behaviour within subsidised partnerships. The main effects of behaviours represent an increment in the knowledge management costs during the monitoring stages. The ex-ante collaboration agreement anticipated and protected intellectual capabilities. Research limitations/implications: This research contributes to the ongoing discussion about public administrations’ opportunistic behaviours in emerging economies (Tripsas et al., 1995), the effectiveness of the innovation and entrepreneurial programmes (Guerrero and Urbano, 2019b), and the link between dual behaviours (collaborative and pportunistic) and knowledge management practices (de Wit-de Vries et al., 2018). Practical limitations/implications: New questions emerged about the effectiveness of subsidies as new modes of knowledge generation among entrepreneurial universities and industrial organisations, as well as the need for implementing strategic knowledge management practices in the public administration. Social limitations/implications: For policymakers, the study presents insights about the effectiveness of public resources. Policymakers should understand challenges and re-define/re-incentivize the productive value chain as well as implement mechanisms to control opportunistic behaviours on potential subsidized firms. Originality: The paper contributes to the academic debate about how entrepreneurial universities and industrial organisations are strategically managing their knowledge when participating in subsidised partnerships in emerging economies.
dc.languageen
dc.subjectEntrepreneurial universities
dc.subjectUniversity-industry partnership
dc.subjectCollaborative behaviours
dc.subjectOpportunistic behaviours
dc.subjectStrategic knowledge management
dc.subjectEmerging economies
dc.titleStrategic knowledge management within subsidised entrepreneurial university-industry partnerships
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución