Executividade da sentença de "improcedência" proferida no processo civil

dc.creatorSilva, Rinaldo Mouzalas de Souza e
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-21
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T21:09:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T19:12:41Z
dc.date.available2014-05-21
dc.date.available2022-09-09T21:09:38Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T19:12:41Z
dc.date.created2014-05-21
dc.date.created2022-09-09T21:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01
dc.identifierhttp://148.201.128.228:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12032/29029
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6149494
dc.description.abstractThe present work aims to demonstrate, through indirect research (literature and documents), that is possible to execute the judgment of dismissal rendered in civil proceedings when recognized benefit entitlement in favor of the defendant. Therefore, it shows that the defendant may be contemplated by the offer of jurisdiction, even when it has not made a request, and that the negative statement of subjective rights claimed by the author may mean recognition of law in favor of the defendant, enforceable.
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectdissertações
dc.subjectprocesso civil
dc.subjectsentenças (processo civil)
dc.subjectdissertations
dc.subjectcivil procedure
dc.subjectjudgments (civil procedure)
dc.titleExecutividade da sentença de "improcedência" proferida no processo civil
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución