Artículos de revistas
Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study
Fecha
2020-04-01Registro en:
Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal. Lawrence: Alliance Communications Group Division Allen Press, v. 57, n. 4, p. 448-457, 2020.
1055-6656
10.1177/1055665619873506
WOS:000525001800007
Autor
Univ Toronto
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Institución
Resumen
Objective: Reliable perceptual and instrumental assessment of oral-nasal balance disorders is a persistent problem in speech-language pathology. The goal of the study was to evaluate whether nasalance-based preclassification of oral-nasal balance disorders improves listener agreement. Design: Retrospective listening study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Participants: Fifty-four randomly selected recordings of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Three experienced speech-language pathologists participated as expert listeners. Interventions: Two listening experiments were based on nasalance scores and audio recordings of speakers with repaired UCLP. The speakers were preclassified as normal, hypernasal, hyponasal, or mixed based on their nasalance scores. Initially, the listeners determined the diagnostic category of the oral-nasal balance for 62 audio recordings (8 repeats). Six months later, they listened to 38 of the recordings (6 repeats) along with a spreadsheet indicating the nasalance-based categories for the oral-nasal balance. The listeners confirmed, or rejected and corrected, the nasalance-based preclassification. Main Outcome Measures: Intralistener, interlistener agreement, and agreement between listener categories and nasalance-based oral-nasal balance categories. Results: In the first study, the agreement between the listeners' diagnostic category and the nasalance-based category was 45.1% and the interlistener agreement was 36.7%. In the second study, the agreement between the listeners' category and the nasalance-based category was 67.1% (75% agreement for the correct nasalance-based categories and 41.7% for the misclassifications), and the interlistener agreement was 85.4%. Conclusions: Preclassification of oral-nasal balance disorders based on nasalance scores may help listeners achieve better diagnostic accuracy and higher agreement.
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Correlação entre peak flow nasal inspiratório e escala visual analógica pré e pós uso de vasoconstrictor nasal
Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco; Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro; Oliveira, Luana Gonçalves; Basile, Luciana Campoy Giro; Costa, Everardo Andrade da -
Schwannoma Of The Nasal Septum: Evaluation Of Unilateral Nasal Mass [schwannoma De Septo Nasal: Avaliação De Massa Nasal Unilateral]
Pauna H.F.; de Carvalho G.M.; Guimaraes A.C.; Maunsell R.C.K.; Sakano E. -
Valores médios do pico de fluxo nasal inspiratório para a população adulta brasileira, antes e após o uso do vasoconstrictor tópico nasal
Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco, 1977-