dc.contributor | Jerade, Miriam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-23T12:09:20Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-08T20:39:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-23T12:09:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-08T20:39:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-23T12:09:20Z | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uai.cl//handle/20.500.12858/2846 | |
dc.identifier | 10.3989/ISEGORIA.2020.062.08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5149544 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this article is to analyze why the interpretation and even the misinter-pretation that Jacques Derrida did of the speech act theory is political. I will expose four aspects that distance Derrida from Austin’s theory that allow a political reading of performativity: the notion force, the origin of the convention, the idea of subjectivity and finally the way in which Derrida reads performativity and the political through his notion of promise under-stood as an event that exceeds all convention and contract, denying deontological interpre-tations of the speech act. | |
dc.title | Repoliticizing the Differences. Derrida and the Speech Act Theory [Repolitizando las diferencias. Derrida y la teoría de los actos de habla]. | |
dc.type | Artículo Scopus | |