dc.contributorJerade, Miriam
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T12:09:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T20:39:50Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T12:09:20Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T20:39:50Z
dc.date.created2021-11-23T12:09:20Z
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uai.cl//handle/20.500.12858/2846
dc.identifier10.3989/ISEGORIA.2020.062.08
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5149544
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to analyze why the interpretation and even the misinter-pretation that Jacques Derrida did of the speech act theory is political. I will expose four aspects that distance Derrida from Austin’s theory that allow a political reading of performativity: the notion force, the origin of the convention, the idea of subjectivity and finally the way in which Derrida reads performativity and the political through his notion of promise under-stood as an event that exceeds all convention and contract, denying deontological interpre-tations of the speech act.
dc.titleRepoliticizing the Differences. Derrida and the Speech Act Theory [Repolitizando las diferencias. Derrida y la teoría de los actos de habla].
dc.typeArtículo Scopus


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución