Citizenship as what's properly human: digressions between illustrated human identity and politics of animal difference.
dc.contributor | Moscoso Flores, Pedro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-28T17:11:41Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-08T20:38:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-28T17:11:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-08T20:38:27Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-01-28T17:11:41Z | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uai.cl//handle/20.500.12858/3679 | |
dc.identifier | 10.18012/arf.2016.30950 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5148854 | |
dc.description.abstract | This text attempts to make explicita flowing tension in modern thought, regardingthe condition of men as a citizens and itsimplications concerning the ways in whichpolitics are thought. From the analysis ofKantian thought, specifically referred to theproblem of ownership by means of reason, theobjective is to establish a differential impactwith the thought of Nietzsche and Benjamin,understanding that both authors seek a solutionto the problem imposed by modern citizen byinstating a reconnection between men and theiranimal condition, subverting the dualismbetween nature and culture. | |
dc.title | Citizenship as what's properly human: digressions between illustrated human identity and politics of animal difference. | |
dc.type | Artículo WoS |