dc.contributorMoscoso Flores, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T17:11:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T20:38:27Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T17:11:41Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T20:38:27Z
dc.date.created2022-01-28T17:11:41Z
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uai.cl//handle/20.500.12858/3679
dc.identifier10.18012/arf.2016.30950
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5148854
dc.description.abstractThis text attempts to make explicita flowing tension in modern thought, regardingthe condition of men as a citizens and itsimplications concerning the ways in whichpolitics are thought. From the analysis ofKantian thought, specifically referred to theproblem of ownership by means of reason, theobjective is to establish a differential impactwith the thought of Nietzsche and Benjamin,understanding that both authors seek a solutionto the problem imposed by modern citizen byinstating a reconnection between men and theiranimal condition, subverting the dualismbetween nature and culture.
dc.titleCitizenship as what's properly human: digressions between illustrated human identity and politics of animal difference.
dc.typeArtículo WoS


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución