dc.contributor | Schwember Augier, Felipe | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-28T17:12:22Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-08T20:35:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-28T17:12:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-08T20:35:10Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-01-28T17:12:22Z | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uai.cl//handle/20.500.12858/3897 | |
dc.identifier | 10.4067/S0718-090X2015000200008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5147039 | |
dc.description.abstract | This work analyses the argument provided by Nozick in support of the State's legitimacy. It will be held that, in fact, this argument deals with two different difficulties: a descriptive one (the harmless and unintended emergence of the State) and another de jure (the legitimacy of the State). The first one is resolved by Nozick via the invisible-hand explanation, and the second one via so-called principle of compensation. I will attempt to demonstrate that this principle is consistent with Locke's political philosophy and, therefore, with lockean libertarianism. | |
dc.title | Invisible-Hand, Lockean Provisos and Private Justice: Emergence and State's Legitimacy in Anarchy, State and Utopia | |
dc.type | Artículo WoS | |