dc.creatorBellido de Luna, Daina
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T04:31:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T20:21:18Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T04:31:25Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T20:21:18Z
dc.date.created2020-12-17T04:31:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-03
dc.identifier0143831X
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/7828
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5143956
dc.description.abstractThe article analyses a range of union-weakening practices developed in three Chilean workplaces. The findings suggest the existence of an ambivalent employment relationship between employers and trade unions where an ongoing informal labour–management partnership simultaneously coexisted with de-collectivising strategies. The article argues that the Chilean state has aided employers in the implementation of such union-weakening practices through the labour legislation. Sixty-nine semi-structured interviews with trade union leaders, human resource managers and field experts inform this research. The legacy of previous forms of state intervention that countered the processes of democratisation is found to be essential in the use of de-collectivisation.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.subjectChile
dc.subjectde-collectivising strategies
dc.subjectindustrial relations
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjecttrade unions
dc.subjectunion-weakening
dc.titleManagement, the state and union-weakening practices in Chile: A case study approach of the dual and ambivalent role of the state in a process of democratisation
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución