dc.creatorHarris Moya, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T05:09:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T20:19:52Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T05:09:23Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T20:19:52Z
dc.date.created2021-01-22T05:09:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier07169132
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/8163
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5143359
dc.description.abstractWhile the divergence of the doctrine is a phenomenon common to other legal areas, within administrative litigation it imposes particular difficulties, as it affects the guarantee of legality and legal certainty, essential components of a State of Law. The division of the administrative doctrine, however, can be reconciled through re-reading of the traditionally confronted positions, as well as appreciation of their reciprocal influence. Within the framework of general jurisdictional actions, the theories of administrative nullity and the responsibility of the administration prove it.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad Austral de Chile
dc.subjectadministrative law
dc.subjectDoctrine
dc.subjectsources of law
dc.titleThe antagonism of the doctrine of nullity and administrative responsibility: Myth or reality?
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución