Is operant selectionism coherent?

dc.contributorTonneau, F., Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Comportamiento, Universidad de Guadalajara, Chapalita, Guadalajara, Mexico CP 45030, Mexico; Sokolowski, M.B.C., Facultd de Philosophie, Sciences Humaines et Sociales, University de Picardie-Jules Verne, Amiens 80025, France
dc.creatorTonneau, F.
dc.creatorSokolowski, M.B.C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-15T18:15:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-02T15:05:30Z
dc.date.available2015-09-15T18:15:47Z
dc.date.available2022-11-02T15:05:30Z
dc.date.created2015-09-15T18:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/42400
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034779845&partnerID=40&md5=618a96ed6fa402af5c9fcdee5d13b907
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5008980
dc.description.abstractHull et al.'s analysis of operant behavior in terms of interaction and replication does not seem consistent with a genuine selection model. The putative replicators do not replicate, and the overall process is more reminiscent of directed mutation than of natural selection. General analogies between natural selection and operant reinforcement are too superficial to be of much scientific use.
dc.relationScopus
dc.relationWOS
dc.relationBehavioral and Brain Sciences
dc.relation24
dc.relation3
dc.relation558
dc.relation559
dc.titleIs operant selectionism coherent?
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución