Article
Comparison of estradiol, testosterone, vitellogenin and cathepsin profiles among young adult channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) females from four selectively bred strains
Autor
Barrero, Marinela
Small, Brian
D´Abramo, L.
Hanson, L
Kelly, A
Institución
Resumen
Potential variation in reproductive performance as young broodfish among four selectively bred strains of channel catfish was
evaluated by comparing profiles of plasma estradiol, testosterone, and vitellogenin, and activities of cathepsin D, L, and B in
follicle-enclosed oocytes during vitellogenesis in 2- to 3-yr-old females. No differences among the four strains were detected for
any of the parameters measured. Plasma steroid concentrations demonstrated temporal differences, with testosterone levels peaking
in January and estradiol levels peaking in April. Monthly changes in circulating vitellogenin concentrations coincided with oocyte
growth. Average oocyte size in May, the typical time of spawning, was smaller (1624 μm) than that considered normal for mature
oocytes (approx. 3000 μm) in this species. Furthermore, only 9% of the females in this study spawned, and no significant
correlations could be determined between the reproductive indices and spawning success. Activities of cathepsin D, L, and B were
also similar between the four strains of catfish. Cathepsin L activity was highest in March, and cathepsin D activity was highest in
March and May. Cathepsin B activity was generally lower than the activities of either cathepsin L or D, with the highest levels
occurring in November, December, and March. This is the first report of cathepsin activities and their relationships to other
reproductive parameters in channel catfish. Scientific and Humanistic Council, Central University of
Venezuela, Mississippi State University, and the Southern
Regional Aquaculture Center. Harvest Select
Farms and Thompson Fisheries and Mona Kirby and Beth Flanagan for conducting
the genotype analyses. Mention of trade name, proprietary
product, or specific equipment does not constitute a
guarantee or warranty by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture and does not imply approval to the exclusion
of other products that may be suitable.