dc.date.accessioned2022-01-18T19:34:39Z
dc.date.available2022-01-18T19:34:39Z
dc.date.created2022-01-18T19:34:39Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/11106
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045413
dc.description.abstractBackground: Depressive disorders are leading contributors to burden of disease in developing countries. Research aiming to improve their diagnosis and treatment is fundamental in these settings, and psychometric tools are widely used instruments to support mental health research. Our aim is to validate and compare the psychometric properties of the Spanish versions of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS). Methodology/Principal Findings: A Spanish version of the CES-D was revised by 5 native Spanish speaking psychiatrists using as reference the English version. A locally standardized Spanish version of the ZSDS was used. These Spanish versions were administered to 70 patients with a clinical diagnosis of DSM-IV Major Depressive Episode (MDE), 63 without major depression but with clinical diagnosis of other psychiatric disorders (OPD), and 61 with no evidence of psychiatric disorders (NEP). For both scales, Cronbach's alpha (C-α) and Hierarchical McDonald Omega for polychoric variables (MD-Ω) were estimated; and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis performed. For the CES-D and ZSDS scales, C-α was 0.93 and 0.89 respectively, while MD-Ω was 0.90 and 0.75 respectively. The area under the ROC curve in MDE+OPD was 0.83 for CES-D and 0.84 for ZSDS; and in MDE+NEP was 0.98 for CES-D and 0.96 for ZSDS. Cut-off scores (co) for the highest proportions of correctly classified (cc) individuals among MDE+OPD were ≥29 for CES-D (sensitivity (ss) = 77.1/specificity (sp) = 79.4%/(cc) = 78.2%) and ≥47 for ZSDS (ss = 85.7%/sp = 71.4%/cc = 78.9%). In the MDE+NEP, co were ≥24 for the CES-D (ss = 91.4%/sp = 96.7%/cc = 93.9%) and ≥45 for the ZSDS (ss = 91.4%/sp = 91.8%/cc = 91.6%). Conclusion: Spanish versions of the CES-D and ZSDS are valid instruments to detect depression in clinical settings and could be useful for both epidemiological research and primary clinical settings in settings similar as those of public hospitals in Lima, Peru.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relationPLoS ONE
dc.relation1932-6203
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectmental disease
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectLanguage
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectscoring system
dc.subjectarea under the curve
dc.subjectDepressive Disorder
dc.subjectPsychiatric Status Rating Scales
dc.subjectrating scale
dc.subjectpublic hospital
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristic
dc.subjectvalidation process
dc.subjectSpain
dc.subjectDSM-IV
dc.subjectDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
dc.subjectmajor depression
dc.subjectCronbach alpha coefficient
dc.subjectpsychometry
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
dc.subjectpsychiatrist
dc.subjectZung Self-Rating Depression Scale
dc.titleValidation of the Spanish Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scales: A Comparative Validation Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución