dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T14:56:09Z
dc.date.available2019-02-22T14:56:09Z
dc.date.created2019-02-22T14:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/5841
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31223
dc.description.abstractBackground. Health research knowledge translation (KT) is important to improve population health outcomes. Considering social, geographical and cultural contexts, KT in Inuit communities often requires different methods than those commonly used in non-Inuit populations. Objectives. To examine the extent, range and nature of literature about health-related KT in Inuit communities. Design. A scoping review was conducted. A search string was used to search 2 English aggregator databases, ProQuest and EBSCOhost, on 12 March 2015. Study selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers using inclusion and exclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to explicitly state that KT approaches were used to share human health research results in Inuit communities in the Circumpolar North. Articles that evaluated or assessed KT approaches were thematically analysed to identify and characterize elements that contributed to KT success or challenges. Results. From 680 unique records identified in the initial search, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Of these 39 articles, 17 evaluated the KT approach used; thematic analysis identified 3 themes within these 17 articles: the value of community stakeholders as active members in the research process; the importance of local context in tailoring KT strategies and messaging; and the challenges with varying and contradictory health messaging in KT. A crosscutting gap in the literature, however, included a lack of critical assessment of community involvement in research. The review also identified a gap in assessments of KT in the literature. Research primarily focused on whether KT methods reflected the local culture and needs of the community. Assessments rarely focused on whether KT had successfully elicited its intended action. Conclusions. This review synthesized a small but burgeoning area of research. Community engagement was important for successful KT; however, more discussion and discourse on the tensions, challenges and opportunities for improvement are necessary.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relationInternational Journal of Circumpolar Health
dc.relation2242-3982
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectattitude to health
dc.subjectmedical research
dc.subjectdata base
dc.subjectArctic
dc.subjectArctic Regions
dc.subjectCircumpolar North
dc.subjectDissemination
dc.subjectinformation dissemination
dc.subjectInformation Dissemination
dc.subjectInuit
dc.subjectKnowledge exchange
dc.subjectKnowledge transfer
dc.subjectKnowledge translation
dc.subjectPublic health messaging
dc.subjectResults sharing
dc.subjectScoping review
dc.subjecttension
dc.subjectthematic analysis
dc.subjectTranslational Medical Research
dc.subjecttranslational research
dc.titleWhat do we know about health-related knowledge translation in the circumpolar north? Results from a scoping review
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/review


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución