dc.creatorRamondo, Natalia
dc.creatorRodríguez-Clare, Andrés
dc.creatorSaborío-Rodríguez, Milagro
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-27T21:17:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T13:16:09Z
dc.date.available2020-08-27T21:17:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T13:16:09Z
dc.date.created2020-08-27T21:17:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141449
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/9537
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4553415
dc.description.abstractBecause of scale effects, idea-based growth models imply that larger countries should be much richer than smaller ones. New trade models share the same counterfactual feature. In fact, new trade models exhibit other counterfactual implications associated with scale effects: import shares decrease and relative income levels increase too steeply with country size. We argue that these implications are largely a result of the standard assumption that countries are fully integrated domestically. We depart from this assumption by treating countries as collections of regions that face positive costs to trade among themselves. The resulting model is largely consistent with the data.
dc.languageen
dc.relationAmerican Economic Review, Volumen 106, Number 10 (Octubre 2016) pages 3159–3184
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectECONOMÍA
dc.subjectCOMERCIO
dc.subjectCRECIMIENTO
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVIDAD
dc.subjectANALISIS DE COSTOS
dc.subjectGEOGRAFIA ECONOMICA
dc.subjectINNOVACIONES
dc.subjectCOMERCIO INTERIOR
dc.subjectEFECTOS
dc.subjectTECNOLOGIA
dc.titleTrade, Domestic Frictions, and Scale Effects
dc.typeArtículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución