info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Morphometry and subpopulation structure of Holstein bull spermatozoa: Variations in ejaculates and cryopreservation straws
Fecha
2016Registro en:
Valverde, A., Arenán, H., Sancho, M., Contell, J., Yániz, J., Fernández, A., & Soler, C. (2016). Morphometry and subpopulation structure of Holstein bull spermatozoa: variations in ejaculates and cryopreservation straws. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18, 851–857.
Autor
Arenán, Héctor
Sancho, María
Contell, Jesús
Yániz, Jesús
Fernández, Alejandro
Soler, Carles
Valverde-Abarca, Anthony
Institución
Resumen
Sperm quality is evaluated for the calculation of sperm dosage in artificial reproductive programs. The most common parameter
used is motility, but morphology has a higher potential as a predictor of genetic quality. Morphometry calculations from CASA‑Morph
technology improve morphological evaluation and allow mathematical approaches to the problem. Semen from 28 Holstein bulls
was collected by artificial vagina, and several ejaculates were studied. After general evaluation, samples were diluted, packaged
in 0.25 ml straws, and stored in liquid nitrogen. Two straws per sample were thawed, and slides were processed and stained with
Diff‑Quik. Samples were analyzed by a CASA‑Morph system for eight morphometric parameters. In addition to the “classical” statistical
approach, based on variance analysis (revealing differences between animals, ejaculates, and straws), principal component (PC)
analysis showed that the variables were grouped into PC1, related to size, and PC2 to shape. Subpopulation structure analysis
showed four groups, namely, big, small, short, and narrow from their dominant characteristics, representing 31.0%, 27.3%, 24.1%,
and 17.7% of the total population, respectively. The distributions varied between animals and ejaculates, but between straws,
there were no differences in only four animals. This modern approach of considering an ejaculate sperm population as divided
into subpopulations reflecting quantifiable parameters generated by CASA‑Morph systems technology opens a new view on sperm
function. This is the first study applying this approach to evaluate different ejaculates and straws from the same individual. More
work must be done to improve seminal dose calculations in assisted reproductive programs.