dc.date.accessioned2020-03-11T20:29:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T22:46:16Z
dc.date.available2020-03-11T20:29:07Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T22:46:16Z
dc.date.created2020-03-11T20:29:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10533/238730
dc.identifier15110017
dc.identifierWOS:000340701800093
dc.identifierno scielo
dc.identifiereid=2-s2.0-84906261268
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4470069
dc.description.abstractTo further the understanding and implementation of expert elicitation methods in the evaluation of public policies related to air pollution, the present study's main goal was to explore the potential strengths and weaknesses of structured expert judgment
dc.languageeng
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1021/es500037k
dc.relation10.1021/es500037k
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.titleStructured Expert Judgment to Characterize Uncertainty between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality in Chile
dc.typeArticulo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución