dc.creatorBaritello, Omar
dc.creatorStoll, Josefine
dc.creatorMartínez-Valdés, Eduardo [Chile. Universidad Mayor. Facultad de Ciencias. Centro de Investigación en Fisiología de Ejercicio]
dc.creatorMüller, Steffen
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-26T20:44:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T18:43:00Z
dc.date.available2021-02-26T20:44:49Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T18:43:00Z
dc.date.created2021-02-26T20:44:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifierBaritello O, Stoll J, Martinez-Valdes E, Müller S, Mayer F, Müller J. Neuromuscular activity of trunk muscles during side plank exercise and an additional motoric-task perturbation. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2019; 70: 153-158.
dc.identifier0344-5925
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/7374
dc.identifierhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/fileadmin/content/archiv2019/Heft_6/DtschZSportmed_Originalia_Baritello_Effects_of_Perturbation_Task_on_Trunk_Muscles_during_Core_Exercise_2019-6.pdf
dc.identifier10.5960/dzsm.2019.382
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4455153
dc.description.abstractProblem: Core-specific sensorimotor exercises (CSSE) combined with technically applied unexpected high-intensity perturbations (UHIP) are able to enhance neuromuscular activity of the trunk muscles (TM). SinceincludingUHIP into clinical practice is complicated, it is warranted to implement a feasible perturbation task. Aim of the study was to analyze the effects of an additional motoric-task perturbation on trunk neuromuscular activation pattern during CSSE exercise. Methods: Ten participants (5m/5f; 29±2years; 177±7cm, 74±12kg) were included and prepared with a surface EMG-setup for trunk muscles. EMG-data were collected during a side plank on stable surface (SP; 30sec) and randomly in 3 different conditions: adding a pad under the right elbow (SPP), adding a perturbation task (SP+P) and adding pad and perturbation task (SPP+P). Root mean square (RMS) was calculated for the whole exercise cycle (30sec) and normalized to MVIC (%MVIC). Muscles were grouped to ventral (VR; VL) and dorsal (DR; DL) right/left. In addition, the ratios of Ventral: Dorsal (V: D) and Side-Right: Side-Left (SR: SL) were calculated. Differences between conditions were assessed for muscle groups and ratios (repeated-measures ANOVA; α=0.05). Results: SPP+P showed the highest EMG-RMS for all muscles except DL, showing significant differences between conditions SP and SP+P in VR and VL,respectively. No differences (p<0.05) were found between SPP and SPP+P, SP+P. Ratios revealedno significant differences between conditions. Discussion: The additional motoric-task perturbation during a CSSE significantly enhanced trunk neuromuscular activity.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherDynamic Media Sales Verlag
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceDtsch Z Sportmed. 2019; 70: 153-158
dc.subjectEMG
dc.subjectSensorimotor Training
dc.subjectCore-Stability
dc.subjectInstability
dc.subjectTrunk Exercise
dc.titleNeuromuscular Activity of Trunk Muscles during Side Plank Exercise and an Additional Motoric-Task Perturbation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución