dc.creatorGarcia, Luis Ivan Diaz
dc.creatorCastro, Jordi delgado
dc.date2021
dc.date2022-02-07T21:23:29Z
dc.date2022-02-07T21:23:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T14:52:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T14:52:28Z
dc.identifierDERECHO PUCP,Vol.,105-138,2021
dc.identifierhttps://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/4483
dc.identifier10.18800/derechopucp.202102.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4444113
dc.descriptionThis paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi-structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent as a theoretical position; to narrate how vertex courts and inferior courts behave on precedents; and finally, to know the roadblocks that prevent following precedent correctly.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherPONTIFICIA UNIV CATOLICA PERU. FAC DERECHO
dc.sourceDERECHO PUCP
dc.subjectJudicial precedent
dc.subjectprecedent application
dc.subjectprecedent in civil law
dc.subjectprecedent in common law
dc.titleCivil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución