| dc.creator | Pestaña-Melero, Francisco Luis | |
| dc.creator | Haff, Guy Gregory | |
| dc.creator | Rojas, Francisco Javier | |
| dc.creator | Pérez-Castilla, Alejandro | |
| dc.creator | García-Ramos, Amador | |
| dc.date | 2020-06-04T20:36:14Z | |
| dc.date | 2020-06-04T20:36:14Z | |
| dc.date | 2018-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-18T12:07:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-18T12:07:06Z | |
| dc.identifier | Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 2018, 34(3), 184-190 | |
| dc.identifier | 1065-8483 | |
| dc.identifier | http://repositoriodigital.ucsc.cl/handle/25022009/1762 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.1123/jab.2017-0266 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4441397 | |
| dc.description | Artículo de publicación ISI | |
| dc.description | This study aimed to compare the between-session reliability of the load–velocity relationship between (1) linear versus polynomial regression models, (2) concentric-only versus eccentric–concentric bench press variants, as well as (3) the within-participants versus the between-participants variability of the velocity attained at each percentage of the 1-repetition maximum. The load–velocity relationship of 30 men (age: 21.2 [3.8] y; height: 1.78 [0.07] m, body mass: 72.3 [7.3] kg; bench press 1-repetition maximum: 78.8 [13.2] kg) were evaluated by means of linear and polynomial regression models in the concentric-only and eccentric–concentric bench press variants in a Smith machine. Two sessions were performed with each bench press variant. The main findings were: (1) first-order polynomials (coefficient of variation: 4.39%–4.70%) provided the load–velocity relationship with higher reliability than the second-order polynomials (coefficient of variation: 4.68%–5.04%); (2) the reliability of the load–velocity relationship did not differ between the concentric-only and eccentric–concentric bench press variants; and (3) the within-participants variability of the velocity attained at each percentage of the 1-repetition maximum was markedly lower than the between-participants variability. Taken together, these results highlight that, regardless of the bench press variant considered, the individual determination of the load–velocity relationship by a linear regression model could be recommended to monitor and prescribe the relative load in the Smith machine bench press exercise. | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | Human Kinetics | |
| dc.source | https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2017-0266 | |
| dc.subject | Relative load | |
| dc.subject | Concentric-only | |
| dc.subject | Stretch-shortening cycle | |
| dc.title | Reliability of the load–velocity relationship obtained through linear and polynomial regression models to predict the 1-repetition maximum load | |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
