dc.creatorHaye M., Andrés
dc.creatorLarraín, Antonia
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T20:16:14Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T20:16:14Z
dc.date.created2021-11-26T20:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier10.1590/2176-457335039
dc.identifier2176-4573
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85047097426&partnerID=MN8TOARS
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/62983
dc.description.abstractAccording to Bakhtin, to speak is to reply, and replies are neither known in advance, as they are unrepeatable creative acts, nor completely novel, as they recreate the given word. Thus, one relevant question is how a given utterance leads to a specific contingent contestation among many possible others. In order to contribute to answering this question, we elaborate on the notion of discursive fields, offering an integrative account of their dynamic, virtual and dialogical nature. Bergson, Simondon and Deleuze help us to better understand how it is that the repetition of a sign, when it takes place within a field of anticipation, has the effect of an unrepeatable turn. Bakhtin and Voloshinov, in this connection, help us to explain how this field works as the historical background against which social and subjective positionings introduce novelty to the ongoing transformation of the common ground among speakers.
dc.languagept
dc.relationBakhtiniana, vol. 13, no. 2 (2018), pp. 79-99.
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectAnticipation
dc.subjectDialogicality
dc.subjectField
dc.subjectImagination
dc.subjectMemory
dc.subjectReturn
dc.subjectUtterance
dc.titleCampo e enunciado : Problema da articulação do discurso
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución