dc.creator | Carmona Puerta, Raimundo | |
dc.creator | Lorenzo Martínez, Elizabeth | |
dc.creator | Rabassa López-Calleja, Magda Alina | |
dc.creator | Padrón Pena, Gustavo | |
dc.creator | Castro Torres, Yaniel | |
dc.creator | Cruz Elizundia, Juan Miguel | |
dc.creator | Rodríguez González, Fernando | |
dc.creator | García Vázquez, Luis Ángel | |
dc.creator | Chávez González, Elibet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T18:21:27Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-17T16:25:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T18:21:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-17T16:25:32Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-03-14T18:21:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier | Med Princ Pract 2021;30:462–469 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1159/000518262 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/184170 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4420830 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS). Subjects and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated. Results: The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: 82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%). Conclusions: Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | Karger | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | |
dc.source | Medical Principles and Practice | |
dc.subject | Atrial conduction time | |
dc.subject | P-wave | |
dc.subject | Electrocardiogram | |
dc.subject | Atrial fibrillation | |
dc.subject | Electrophysiological study | |
dc.title | New parameter of the second half of the p-wave, p-wave duration, and atrial conduction times predict atrial fibrillation during electrophysiological studies | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |