Artículo de revista
Sildenafil for treating patients with COVID-19 and perfusion mismatch: a pilot randomized trial
Fecha
2022Registro en:
Critical Care (2022) 26:1
10.1186/s13054-021-03885-y
Autor
Santamarina, Mario G.
Beddings, Ignacio
Martínez Lomakin, Felipe
Boisier Riscal, Dominique
Gutiérrez Claveria, Mónica
Vidal Marambio, Jaime
Retamal Báez, Nicole
Pávez Novoa, Cristian
Reyes Allende, Cesar
Ferreira Perey, Paulina
Gutiérrez Torres, Miguel
Villalobos Mazza, Camila
Vergara Sagredo, Constanza
Ahumada Bermejo, Sebastián
Labarca Mellado, Eduardo
Barthel Munchmeyer, Elizabeth
Marchant Ramos, Solange
Volpacchio, Mariano
Vega, Jorge
Institución
Resumen
Background: SARS-CoV-2 seems to afect the regulation of pulmonary perfusion. Hypoperfusion in areas of well-aerated lung parenchyma results in a ventilation–perfusion mismatch that can be characterized using subtraction computed tomography angiography (sCTA). This study aims to evaluate the efcacy of oral sildenafl in treating COVID-19
inpatients showing perfusion abnormalities in sCTA.
Methods: Triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Chile in a tertiary-care hospital able
to provide on-site sCTA scans and ventilatory support when needed between August 2020 and March 2021. In total,
82 eligible adults were admitted to the ED with RT-PCR-confrmed or highly probable SARS-COV-2 infection and sCTA
performed within 24 h of admission showing perfusion abnormalities in areas of well-aerated lung parenchyma; 42
were excluded and 40 participants were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio) once hospitalized. The active intervention group received sildenafl (25 mg orally three times a day for seven days), and the control group received identical
placebo capsules in the same way. Primary outcomes were diferences in oxygenation parameters measured daily
during follow-up (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and A-a gradient). Secondary outcomes included admission to the ICU, requirement
of non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and mortality rates. Analysis was performed on an
intention-to-treat basis.
Results: Totally, 40 participants were enrolled (20 in the placebo group and 20 in the sildenafl group); 33 [82.5%]
were male; and median age was 57 [IQR 41–68] years. No signifcant diferences in mean PaO2/FiO2 ratios and A-a gradients were found between groups (repeated-measures ANOVA p=0.67 and p=0.69). IMV was required in 4 patients
who received placebo and none in the sildenafl arm (logrank p=0.04). Patients in the sildenafl arm showed a signifcantly shorter median length of hospital stay than the placebo group (9 IQR 7–12 days vs. 12 IQR 9–21 days, p=0.04).
Conclusions: No statistically signifcant diferences were found in the oxygenation parameters. Sildenafl treatment
could have a potential therapeutic role regarding the need for IMV in COVID-19 patients with specifc perfusion patterns in sCTA. A large-scale study is needed to confrm these results.