info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
An Anthology of Philosophical Studies: Volume 10
Fecha
2016Registro en:
Lussich, Dolores María; An Anthology of Philosophical Studies: Volume 10; Atiner; 10; 2016; 300
978-960-598-046-7
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Lussich, Dolores María
Resumen
Gianni Vattimo claims that any reading of Nietzsche presupposes an interpretation of its two central concepts: Eternal Recurrence and Übermensch (Superman). In this work, we intend to show how some interpretations of these concepts fail to seize the complexity of Nietzsche´s definitions. First, we will discuss Heidegger´s interpretation. In his Nietzsche, the author presents the Eternal Recurrence as an inevitable repetition. The Übermensch is doomed to an existence trapped in the takeover of life by technology. We will read the same paragraph as Heidegger ?On Redemption? but with opposite conclusions. Our argument is that the figure of the handicapped ciphers the answer of Zarathustra regarding Eternal Recurrence. In their fragility resides their own strength. Thus, the Eternal Recurrence is understood as a transition from negativity to affirmation. In this sense, we will also discuss Deleuze, regarding his idea of Will to Power as pure affirmation. In our reading, neither positivity nor negativity is transcended but maintained as forces in tension. Keywords: Nietzsche-Eternal Recurrence-Will to Power