info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Legal and institutional tools to mitigate marine turtle bycatch: Argentina as a case study
Fecha
2012-11Registro en:
González Carman, Victoria; Machain, Natalia; Albareda, Diego; Mianzan, Hermes Walter; Campagna, Claudio; Legal and institutional tools to mitigate marine turtle bycatch: Argentina as a case study; Elsevier Science; Marine Policy; 36; 6; 11-2012; 1265-1274
0308-597X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
González Carman, Victoria
Machain, Natalia
Albareda, Diego
Mianzan, Hermes Walter
Campagna, Claudio
Resumen
This paper explores conservation policy pertinent to three species of marine turtles affected by fisheries, while crossing jurisdictions in their seasonal migrations through the SW Atlantic, particularly the Argentine waters. This case study reviews local legal and institutional frameworks for Argentina and concludes that tools are in place to monitor and mitigate the negative impact of bycatch on the populations. Argentina is signatory of the most relevant international treaties aimed at protecting transboundary species (e.g. Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles, Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals). Legislation also exists at the federal and provincial levels. Yet, accidental captures continue to occur due to weaknesses in enforcement and the low priority that conservation has in fisheries management decisions. Some urgent practical actions supported by policy are suggested: (a) placement of on-board observers in coastal fishing fleets, (b) application of existing mitigation measures to reduce bycatch, (c) design of a national plan of action for marine turtles in Argentina, and (d) development of a regional plan between Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. Stakeholder involvement, especially the fishing sector but also the civil society, would be important to energize practical and effective conservation decisions. The example of Argentina is typical for the region and may apply to other countries as well. The conservation community requires investing more in the application of policy, concomitant with perfecting legal tools.