info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
Fecha
2021-07Registro en:
Bikakis, Antonis; Cohen, Andrea; Dvoák, Wolfgang; Flouris, Giorgos; Parsons, Simon; Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics: The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications; 8; 6; 7-2021; 1437-1501
2631-9810
2631-9829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Bikakis, Antonis
Cohen, Andrea
Dvoák, Wolfgang
Flouris, Giorgos
Parsons, Simon
Resumen
While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.