info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: limitations and insights
Fecha
2008-12Registro en:
Herrel, Anthony; Schaerlaeken, Vicky; Ross, Callum; Meyers, Jay; Nishikawa, Kiisa; et al.; Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: limitations and insights; Oxford University Press; Integrative and Comparative Biology; 48; 2; 12-2008; 261-271
1540-7063
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Herrel, Anthony
Schaerlaeken, Vicky
Ross, Callum
Meyers, Jay
Nishikawa, Kiisa
Abdala, Virginia Sara Luz
Manzano, Adriana Silvina
Aerts, Peter
Resumen
Electromyography (EMG), or the study of muscle activation patterns, has long been used to infer central nervous system (CNS) control of the musculoskeletal system and the evolution of that control. As the activation of the muscles at the level of the periphery is a reflection of the interaction of descending influences and local reflex control, EMG is an important tool in integrated investigations of the evolution of coordination in complex, musculoskeletal systems. Yet, the use of EMG as a tool to understand the evolution of motor control has its limitations. We here review the potential limitations and opportunities of the use of EMG in studying the evolution of motor control in vertebrates and provide original previously unpublished data to illustrate this. The relative timing of activation of a set of muscles can be used to evaluate CNS coordination of the components in a musculoskeletal system. Studies of relative timing reveal task-dependent variability in the recruitment of different populations of muscle fibers (i.e., different fiber types) within a single muscle, and left–right asymmetries in activation that need to be taken into account in comparative studies. The magnitude of muscle recruitment is strongly influenced by the instantaneous demands imposed on the system, and is likely determined by local reflex-control systems. Consequently, using EMG to make meaningful inferences about evolutionary changes in musculoskeletal control requires comparisons across similar functional tasks. Moreover, our data show that inferences about the evolution of motor control are limited in their explanatory power without proper insights into the kinematics and dynamics of a system.