info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Is it necessary to screen for celiac disease in postmenopausal osteoporotic women?
Fecha
2002-08Registro en:
González, D.; Sugai, Emilia; Gomez, J.C.; Oliveri, María Beatriz; Gomez Acotto, C.; et al.; Is it necessary to screen for celiac disease in postmenopausal osteoporotic women?; Springer; Calcified Tissue International; 71; 2; 8-2002; 141-144
0171-967X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
González, D.
Sugai, Emilia
Gomez, J.C.
Oliveri, María Beatriz
Gomez Acotto, C.
Vega, Eduardo
Bagur, Alicia Cristina
Mazurek, R.
Mauriño, E.
Bai, J.C.
Mautalen, Carlos Alfredo
Resumen
Decreased bone mass is a frequent finding in celiac patients, and subclinical celiac disease (CD) appears to be unusually overrepresented among patients with idiopathic osteoporosis. Since silent CD may be more common than previously believed, it has been suggested that all osteoporotic patients should be checked for occult CD. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of CD in a well-defined population of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. We evaluated 127 consecutive postmenopausal patients (mean age: 68 years; range: 50-82 years) with verified osteoporosis. The observed prevalence of CD in this group was compared to that observed in a group of 747 women recruited for a population-based study. The screening algorithm used to diagnose CD was based on a 3-level screening using type IgA and IgG antigliadin antibodies (AGA) in all the patients (1st level) followed by antiendomysial antibodies (EmA) and total IgA (2nd level) of samples testing positive, and intestinal biopsy of positive cases (3rd level). At the end of the serological screening, only 1 of 127 osteoporotic women was eligible for jejunal biopsy showing a characteristic celiac flat mucosa (prevalence 7.9 × 1,000; 95% CI 0.2-43.1). In addition, CD was diagnosed in 6 of 747 women of the population-based study (prevalence: 8.0 × 1,000; 95% CI 3.3-18.3). There was no significant difference between the two groups. Therefore, our study showed that the prevalence of CD in postmenopausal osteoporotic women was lower than that reported in previous studies and similar to that of the general population. In conclusion, although the relatively small size of the group tested does not allow us to be conclusive, the results suggest that a case finding policy in postmenopausal osteoporosis would have a high cost/benefit ratio except for patients not responding to conventional therapies, or presenting borderline laboratory results.