info:eu-repo/semantics/article
The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: A review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases
Fecha
2010-04Registro en:
Lambrechts, Marcel M.; Adriaensen, Frank; Ardia, Daniel R.; Artemyev, Alexandr V.; Atiénzar, Francisco; et al.; The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: A review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases; Polish Academy of Sciences; Acta Ornithologica; 45; 1; 4-2010; 1-26
0001-6454
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Lambrechts, Marcel M.
Adriaensen, Frank
Ardia, Daniel R.
Artemyev, Alexandr V.
Atiénzar, Francisco
Bánbura, Jerzy
Barba, Emilio
Bouvier, Jean Charles
Camprodon, Jordi
Cooper, Caren B.
Dawson, Russell D.
Eens, Marcel
Eeva, Tapio
Faivre, Bruno
Garamszegi, Lazlo Z.
Goodenough, Anne E.
Gosler, Andrew G.
Grégoire, Arnaud
Griffith, Simon C.
Gustafsson, Lars
Johnson, L. Scott
Kania, Wojciech
Keišs, Oskars
Llambias, Paulo
Mainwaring, Mark C.
Mänd, Raivo
Massa, Bruno
Mazgajski, Tomasz D.
Møller, Anders Pape
Moreno, Juan
Naef Daenzer, Beat
Nilsson, Jan-Ke
Norte, Ana C.
Orell, Markku
Otter, Ken A.
Park, Chan Ryul
Perrins, Christopher M.
Pinowski, Jan
Porkert, Jiri
Potti, Jaime
Remes, Vladimir
Richner, Heinz
Rytkönen, Seppo
Shiao, Ming-Tang
Silverin, Bengt
Slagsvold, Tore
Smith, Henrik G.
Sorace, Alberto
Stenning, Martyn J.
Stewart, Ian
Thompson, Charles F.
Tryjanowski, Piotr
Török, Janos
Noordwijk, Arie J. Van
Winkler, David W.
Ziane, Nadia
Resumen
The widespread use of artificial nestboxes has led to significant advances in our knowledge of the ecology, behaviour and physiology of cavity nesting birds, especially small passerines. Nestboxes have made it easier to perform routine monitoring and experimental manipulation of eggs or nestlings, and also repeatedly to capture, identify and manipulate the parents. However, when comparing results across study sites the use of nestboxes may also introduce a potentially significant confounding variable in the form of differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. However, the use of nestboxes may also introduce an unconsidered and potentially significant confounding variable due to differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. Here we review to what extent the characteristics of artificial nestboxes (e.g. size, shape, construction material, colour) are documented in the 'methods' sections of publications involving hole-nesting passerine birds using natural or excavated cavities or artificial nestboxes for reproduction and roosting. Despite explicit previous recommendations that authors describe in detail the characteristics of the nestboxes used, we found that the description of nestbox characteristics in most recent publications remains poor and insufficient. We therefore list the types of descriptive data that should be included in the methods sections of relevant manuscripts and justify this by discussing how variation in nestbox characteristics can affect or confound conclusions from nestbox studies. We also propose several recommendations to improve the reliability and usefulness of research based on long-term studies of any secondary hole-nesting species using artificial nestboxes for breeding or roosting.