info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Raw versus cooked food matching: nutrient intake using the 2015/16 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey
Fecha
2021-03Registro en:
Moltedo, Ana; Jimenez, Sofía; Álvarez Sánchez, Cristina; Manyani, Talent; Ramos, Maria Priscila; et al.; Raw versus cooked food matching: nutrient intake using the 2015/16 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Journal of Food Composition and Analysis; 102; 103879; 3-2021; 1-10
0889-1575
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Moltedo, Ana
Jimenez, Sofía
Álvarez Sánchez, Cristina
Manyani, Talent
Ramos, Maria Priscila
Custodio, Estefanía
Resumen
In many countries, statistics from household consumption and expenditure surveys are increasingly being used to inform policies and programs. In household surveys, foods are typically reported as they are acquired (the majority are raw). However, the micronutrient content of some foods diminishes during processing and cooking. Using food consumption data from the 2015/16 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey, this study analyzes whether mean consumption estimates of dietary energy, macronutrients, and eight micronutrients are equivalent (applying a two-side paired equivalence test) when matching foods: (1) considering the nutrient content in raw foods (as reported in the survey), and (2) considering the nutrient content in foods as typically consumed, thus applying yield and retention factors as needed. Both food matching approaches rendered statistically equivalent mean consumption estimates, at national and county levels, for dietary energy, protein, fats, available carbohydrates, total fiber, calcium and zinc. Non-equivalent means were found for iron, vitamins A, B1, B2, B12, and C. The higher differences between the means were, in percentage change, for vitamin C (47%), B1 (34%) and B12 (26%).