info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study
Fecha
2018-09Registro en:
Rivo, J. C.; Amyx, Melissa Michele; Pingray, María Verónica; Casale, R. A.; Fiorillo, Angel Eduardo; et al.; Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 125; 10; 9-2018; 1294-1302
1470-0328
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Rivo, J. C.
Amyx, Melissa Michele
Pingray, María Verónica
Casale, R. A.
Fiorillo, Angel Eduardo
Krupitzki, Hugo Bernardo
Malamud, J. D.
Mendilaharzu, M.
Medina, M. L.
del Pino, A. B.
Ribola, L.
Schvartzman, Javier Alfonso
Tartalo, G. M.
Trasmonte, Monica
Varela, S.
Althabe, Fernando
Belizán, J. M.
Resumen
Objective: To describe obstetrical providers’ delivery preferences and attitudes towards caesarean section without medical indication, including on maternal request, and to examine the association between provider characteristics and preferences/attitudes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Two public and two private hospitals in Argentina. Population: Obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives who provide prenatal care and/or labour/delivery services. Methods: Providers in hospitals with at least 1000 births per year completed a self-administered, anonymous survey. Main outcome measures: Provider delivery preference for low-risk women, perception of women's preferred delivery method, support for a woman's right to choose her delivery method and willingness to perform caesarean section on maternal request. Results: 168 providers participated (89.8% coverage rate). Providers (93.2%) preferred a vaginal delivery for their patients in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section. Whereas 74.4% of providers supported their patient's right to choose a delivery method in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section and 66.7% would perform a caesarean section upon maternal request, only 30.4% would consider a non-medically indicated caesarean section for their own personal delivery or that of their partner. In multivariate adjusted analysis, providers in the private sector [odds ratio (OR) 4.70, 95% CI 1.19–18.62] and obstetrician-gynaecologists (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.58–12.09) were more willing than either providers working in the public/both settings or midwives to perform a caesarean section on maternal request. Conclusions: Despite the ethical debate surrounding non-medically indicated caesarean sections, we observe very high levels of support, especially by providers in the private sector and obstetrician-gynaecologists, as aligned with the high caesarean section rates in Argentina. Tweetable abstract: Non-medically indicated c-section? 74% of sampled Argentine OB providers support women's right to choose.
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Estimation of multiequation cross-section models in the presence of spatial autocorrelation
Carvalho, Alexandre Xavier Ywata de; Mata, Daniel da; Chomitz, Kenneth M. -
Tópicos em econometria espacial para dados cross-section
Carvalho, Alexandre Xavier Ywata de; Albuquerque, Pedro Henrique Melo