info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Engaging stakeholders across a socio-environmentally diverse network of water research sites in North and South America
Fecha
2021-06Registro en:
Smyth, Robyn L.; Fatima, Uroosa; Segarra, Monique; Borre, Lisa; Zilio, Mariana Ines; et al.; Engaging stakeholders across a socio-environmentally diverse network of water research sites in North and South America; Elsevier; Environmental Development; 38; 6-2021; 1-20; 100582
2211-4645
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Smyth, Robyn L.
Fatima, Uroosa
Segarra, Monique
Borre, Lisa
Zilio, Mariana Ines
Reid, Brian
Pincetl, Stephanie
Astorga, Anna
Huamantinco Cisneros, María Andrea
Conde, Sergio Daniel
Harmon, Thomas Christopher
Hoyos, Natalia
Escobar, Jaime
Lozoya, Juan Pablo
Perillo, Gerardo Miguel E.
Piccolo, Maria Cintia
Rusak, James A.
Velez, Maria I.
Resumen
Maintaining and restoring freshwater ecosystem services in the face of local and global change requires adaptive research that effectively engages stakeholders. However, there is a lack of understanding and consensus in the research community regarding where, when, and which stakeholders should be engaged and what kind of researcher should do the engaging (e.g., physical, ecological, or social scientists). This paper explores stakeholder engagement across a developing network of aquatic research sites in North and South America with wide ranging cultural norms, social values, resource management paradigms, and eco-physical conditions. With seven sites in six countries, we found different degrees of engagement were explained by differences in the interests of the stakeholders given the history and perceived urgency of water resource problems as well as differences in the capacities of the site teams to effectively engage given their expertise and resources. We categorized engagement activities and applied Hurlbert and Gupta's split ladder of participation to better understand site differences and distill lessons learned for planning comparative socio-hydrological research and systematic evaluations of the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement approaches. We recommend research networks practice deliberate engagement of stakeholders that adaptively accounts for variations and changes in local socio-hydrologic conditions. This, in turn, requires further efforts to foster the development of well-integrated research teams that attract and retain researchers from multiple social science disciplines and enable training on effective engagement strategies for diverse conditions.