dc.contributor0000-0002-7441-3233
dc.contributor0000-0003-2866-3650
dc.creatorFoladori, Guillermo
dc.creatorInvernizzi, Noela
dc.creatorZáyago Lau, Edgar
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-07T19:38:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T15:14:01Z
dc.date.available2017-06-07T19:38:33Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T15:14:01Z
dc.date.created2017-06-07T19:38:33Z
dc.date.issued2009-06
dc.identifier1871-4757
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/293
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4247356
dc.description.abstractThe current literature on nanoethics focuses on a wide array of topics such as equity, privacy, military, environment, human enhancement, intellectual property, and security. The identification of those topics leads to the adoption of an ethical stance, which we call the in itself dimension. In this article we argue that even though it is correct to identify the areas where ethical problems are imperative to deal with (in itself dimension), it is a partial approach. This is because the in itself dimension pays no attention to another ethical stance; one that does not have anything to do with individual or collective responsibilities, but rather with the socio-economic system into which those responsibilities are embedded. We call this second issue the contextual dimension.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationgeneral Public
dc.relationhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11569-009-0060-4
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
dc.sourceNanoethics (2009) 3:121–127
dc.titleTwo Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución