Reply to Comment on ‘Electromagnetic potentials without gauge transformation’

dc.contributor0000-0001-5324-1834
dc.contributor0000-0002-1478-7946
dc.creatorChubykalo, Andrew
dc.creatorEspinoza, Augusto
dc.creatorAlvarado Flores, Rolando
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T19:08:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T15:12:26Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T19:08:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T15:12:26Z
dc.date.created2018-06-11T19:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-22
dc.identifier1402-4896
dc.identifier0031-8949
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/520
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4246513
dc.description.abstractThis is a reply to the criticism from Engelhardt and Onoochin of our work (2011 Phys. Scr. 84 015009): a general argument for the possibility of different solutions in different gauges unrelated to gauge transformation; a result that has been given by Engelhardt and Onoochin using examples. For this reason we are not in any sense trying to refute the statements made by Engelhardt and Onoochin, instead we are offering a possible theoretical explanation of their results.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherThe Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
dc.relationgeneralPublic
dc.relationhttp://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1402-4896
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América
dc.sourcePhysica Scripta, Núm, 85, 2012.
dc.titleReply to Comment on ‘Electromagnetic potentials without gauge transformation’
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución