Tesis
Farelo de brassica na alimentação de vacas leiteiras
Fecha
2018-03-05Registro en:
MOURA, Daiane Caroline de. Farelo de brassica na alimentação de vacas leiteiras. 2018. 50 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Agronomia, Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Cuiabá, 2018.
Autor
Oliveira, André Soares de
Brito, André Fonseca de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8347197465301033
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4584372276541095
Oliveira, André Soares de
042.370.957-70
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4584372276541095
Brito, André Fonseca de
686.108.745-91
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8347197465301033
042.370.957-70
686.108.745-91
Paula, Nelcino Francisco de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9430306792139455
004.568.941-52
Paula, Nelcino Francisco de
004.568.941-52
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9430306792139455
Moraes, Eduardo Henrique Bevitori Kling de
029.155.486-03
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1638923849126806
Batista, Erick Darlisson
067.363.566-01
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3891266981447486
Institución
Resumen
This thesis is divided into 2 chapters. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of
inclusion of crambe meal (CM, 382.4 g crude protein/kg dry matter (DM), 450 mg
glucosinolates/kg DM) in the total partial diet (pTMR, 0, 45, 90 and 135 g/kg DM), on the
productive performance, nutrient utilization efficiency in dairy cows and cheese preference for
untrained consumers. Twelve dairy cows were used: eight crossbred Holstein × Zebu cows (456 ±
91 kg body weight) and four Jersey cows (384 ± 32.29 kg body weight) distributed in three
simultaneous 4 × 4 Latin squares with four experimental periods of 21 days each. The pTMR were
isonitrogenated (130 g CP/kg DM) and offered ad libitum between milking from 7:00 am and 6:30
pm. Cows between the hours of 19:00 in the afternoon until 6:30 in the morning remained in
pastures Panicum Maximum cv. Mombaça (564 g neutral detergent fiber/kg MS and 90.4 g CP/kg
DM). Milk yield and pTMR intake were recorded from day 15th to day 21st of each experimental
period. The milk samples were collected on days 17th and 18th of each experimental period. Fecal
samples from each animal were collected between 17th and 21st to estimate fecal excretion (using
titanium dioxide as an external indicator) and for pasture consumption (using indigestible neutral
detergent insoluble fiber after 288 ruminal in situ incubation). The inclusion of CM did not affect
pTMR intake (P = 0.173, 11.47 ± 0.20 kg DM/day), forage intake (P = 0.185, 0.90 ± 0.07 kg
DM/day), CP intake (P = 0.481, 1.49 ± 0.01 kg CP/day), organic matter digestibility (P = 0.254,
0.749 (P = 0.545, 0.747 ± 0.02 g/g), microbial protein synthesis (P = 0.348, 0.83 ± 0.08 kg/d),
milk yield (P = 0., 64.2 ± 1.3 g/d), milk yield (P = 0.462; 13.29 ± 0.24 kg/d), nitrogen (N) milk
(P = 0.566; 64.2 ± 1.3 g/d), milk urea-N (P = 0.178; 10.6 ± 0.94 mg/dL), N urinary excretion (P =
0.717; 90.9 ± 1.9 g/d), N milk efficiency (P = 0.622; 0.268 ± 0.01 g N milk/g N intake) hepatic
function IU/mL (GGT 32.05 ± 2.94, ALT 15.98 ± 0.44 and AST 48.02 ± 5.71), cheese yield (0.21
± 0.01 kg/kg milk) and sensory analysis (I liked 59.78 , 80.00, 76.00, 77.67% of the tasters).
Crambe meal can be up to 135 g/kg DM in pTMR without affects productive performance,
efficiency of nutrient utilization in dairy cows and cheese preference for untrained consumers. We
used meta-analytical approach to evaluate the effects of replacement of different sources of protein
by brassicas meals on milk production and nutrient utilization of dairy cows, from 37 peer-review
papers. Canola meal (CM) was unique brassica source founded. The effects were compared by
raw mean differences (RMD) between CM diet and control treatment means and weighted by
inverse variance using random-effect models. Heterogeneity level was analyzed by I
2
statistic (low
≤ 25%; moderate = 26 to 50%; and high > 50%). In overall, use of CM as protein source increased
DM intake (RMD = 0,22 ± 0.12 kg DM/d; P < 0.01; n = 79; I
2 = 9.1%) and crude protein (CP)
intake (RMD = 0,14 ± 0.07 kg CP/d; P < 0.01; n = 33; I
2 = 21.1%), both with low heterogeneity,
but it did not affect organic matter total-tract digestibility (P = 0.50; n = 12; I
2 = 29.2%). In overall,
use of CM increased milk yield (RMD = 0.69 ± 0.35 kg/d; P < 0.01; n = 88; I
2 = 74.9%), but its
effect depends on protein sources comparation: CM versus SBM did not increase milk yield (RMD
= 0.23 ± 0.66 kg/d; P = 0.50; n = 33), but milk yield was increased with replacement of DDG by
CM (RMD = 2.03 ± 1.67 kg/d; P < 0.01; n = 13) and of other protein sources by CM (RMD =
0.82 ± 0.43 kg/d; P < 0.01; n = 42). In overall, CM use did not affect milk protein content (P =
0.08; n = 60; I
2 = 19.5%) and milk fat content (P = 0.20; n = 60; I
2 = 16.9%), but CM increased
milk protein yield (RMD = 0,02 ± 0.01 kg/d; P < 0.01; n = 60; I
2 = 0%). Use of CM reduced milk
urea nitrogen (N) (RMD = - 0,98 ± 0.31 mg/dL; P < 0.01; n = 22; I
2 = 32.2%) and increase N
intake milk efficiency (RMD = 0.22% N milk/N intake ± 0.07 mg/dL; P ≤ 0.05; n = 34; I
2 = 0%),
both with low heterogeneity. We concluded that CM is similar protein source to SBM and it is
more effective than DDG and other sources (cottonseed meal, corn gluten meal and sunflower
meal) to lactating dairy cows.