dc.contributorGarcia, Michele Vargas
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8921088842000990
dc.contributorLessa, Alexandre Hundertmark
dc.contributorXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
dc.contributorVaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida
dc.contributorXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
dc.contributorSalgado, Márcia Machado
dc.contributorXXXXXXXXXXXX
dc.contributorCosta, Maristela Julio
dc.contributorXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
dc.creatorVellozo, Fernanda Freitas
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T12:00:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T23:47:31Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T12:00:36Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T23:47:31Z
dc.date.created2021-05-21T12:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-09
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20952
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4041628
dc.description.abstractObjective: Check the difference between tonal averages in two groups of subjects with descending audiometric configuration and analyze which one best represents the degree of hearing impairment. Furthermore, to study the Speech Recognition Percentage Index (SRPI) and its relation with the time of auditory sensory deprivation of these subjects. Method: Participated in the study 28 subjects, with descending audiometric configuration, divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) - average frequencies of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz (TTM) equal to or less than 25 dB and Group 2 (G2) - hearing thresholds above 25 dB in TTM. The average of frequencies from: 250 Hz to 8000 Hz (8M) was compared with TTM; and with frequencies from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz (QTTM). The different tonal averages were correlated with the hearing disadvantage obtained through the HHIA/HHIE-S questionnaires. Moreover, the influence of the time of auditory sensory deprivation on the SRPI between the groups was analyzed. Results: For G1, one 8M showed a result superior to others, statistically significant, while for G2, this result was observed only in TTM. When correlating the different tonal averages with the degree of hearing impairment, the correlation strength was more expressive for 8M. The subjects in G2 had the longest time of auditory sensory deprivation and the worst scores in the SRPI. It was also observed that the longer the time of auditory sensory deprivation the worse the scores on the SRPI, being more expressive for the G2. Conclusion: For the hearing losses of descending audiometric configuration, the M8 better represented the hearing disadvantage presented by the subjects of G1. The time of auditory sensory deprivation influenced the performance of speech perception, especially when TTM was altered.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFonoaudiologia
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana
dc.publisherCentro de Ciências da Saúde
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectAudição
dc.subjectPerda auditiva
dc.subjectAudiometria da fala
dc.subjectQuestionários
dc.subjectPrivação sensorial
dc.subjectHearing
dc.subjectHearing loss
dc.subjectSpeech audiometry
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectSensory deprivation
dc.titleConfiguração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
dc.typeTese


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución