Tese
Estudo clínico dos sinais enunciativos de aquisição da linguagem: relações com prematuridade e psiquismo nos dois primeiros anos
Fecha
2018-07-10Autor
Oliveira, Luciéle Dias
Institución
Resumen
This thesis aimed to analyze the language acquisition, by Language Acquisition
Enunciative Signals (SEAL) of preterm and full term infants, with and without psychic
risk, from three to 24 months. The analysis included correlation and comparison
analyzes between SEAL, the Bayley III Scale and the Denver II Scale, as well as
scripts and signs of psychic risk and prematurity. It was also sought to analyze the
language functioning in children who obtained exclusive delay in language
acquisition, from the comparison of the results obtained with the Bayley III Scale and
SEAL. For the statistical analyzes, a sample of 101 mother-baby dyads was used for
SEAL analysis. This sample was reduced for Bayley III Scale to 45 babies. The
qualitative analysis was proposed for the language functioning of seven babies. As
results of this research, a significant correlation was found between the SEAL and
the traditional protocols, Denver II and Bayley III, although with a higher correlation
coefficient in the case of Bayley III Scale. The correlation and comparison between
SEAL and PREAUT Signs in the first half of the baby's life were significant, as well as
the correlation between the SEAL and the Clinical Inventory of Infant Development
Reference (IRDI) at 18 months and the M- CHAT at 24 months, which shows a
correlation between risk of language acquisition and psychic risk. Also, there was a
significant result in the comparison of SEAL results between term and preterm
babies, showing worse performance in preterm infants. In the qualitative analysis of
seven children data it was observed that the Bayley III Scale and the SEAL are
complementary, however, the SEAL allows us to visualize the maternal factor in the
process of language acquisition, an important data to understand the linguistic
functioning. The results of this thesis allowed to conclude on the clinical value of the
SEAL as a tool for the detection of language acquisition risk, and from its analysis, to
think an initial direction for the intervention, in the construction of a hypothesis of language functioning.