dc.contributor | Machado, Alencar | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/5538050121450638 | |
dc.contributor | Gassen, Jonas Bulegon | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/9693649745603984 | |
dc.contributor | Fontoura, Lisandra Manzoni | |
dc.contributor | Thom, Lucinéia Heloisa | |
dc.creator | Dalla Favera, Gabriel Bolson | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-29T13:02:37Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-07T22:42:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-29T13:02:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-07T22:42:26Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-29T13:02:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-03 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23037 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4038066 | |
dc.description.abstract | Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is currently a process modeling language with
the best didactics for use, with a structure that is easy to understand and use. However, the
notation does not address any element or functionality to present risks. Risks are future
situations that cause some type of impact, most of which are negative. Presenting these risks
in process models would allow those involved to perform their activities with more caution, in
order to avoid them. Event-driven Process Chain (EPC) has become an option because it
allows controlling different risk situations that a process may be involved in. In order to
improve BPMN in this direction, it is essential to approach risk management in their
processes, without losing the present didactics. This work aims to develop an extension to
BPMN 2.0 allowing to include risks to the processes. The extension includes two features:
presentation and risk mitigation, which were identified through exploratory research with
experts that works with process modeling, risk management and internal controls, and through
studying of the literature. These features seek to be intuitive, facilitating the construction of
more comprehensive models. In order to test this extension, an experiment was carried out
with students from public and private institutions and people working in the process modeling
area. The experiment compared two models, one described with the BPMN notation with the
extension and the other using the method of Cockburn's written use case notation. The results
of the experiment suggest that the added elements in BPMN do not decrease the correctness
of the responses in relation to the process models, but decrease the mental effort and rework
in their reading when compared to processes described through a textual representation
containing risk information. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | Ciência da Computação | |
dc.publisher | UFSM | |
dc.publisher | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação | |
dc.publisher | Centro de Tecnologia | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.subject | BPM | |
dc.subject | BPMN | |
dc.subject | EPC | |
dc.subject | Gerenciamento de risco | |
dc.subject | Modelagem de processos | |
dc.subject | Risk management | |
dc.subject | Process modeling | |
dc.title | Extensão da notação e modelo de processo de negócio para inclusão de riscos | |
dc.type | Dissertação | |