dc.contributor | Hamm, Christian Viktor | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/5301026925485532 | |
dc.contributor | Williges, Flavio | |
dc.contributor | Chagas, Flávia | |
dc.creator | Leite, Elisabete dos Santos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-17T15:00:35Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-07T21:58:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-17T15:00:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-07T21:58:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-12-17T15:00:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-26 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23360 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4033316 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation consists of an introductory presentation on "the problem of
dysthanasia in the light of the current bioethical discussion", a specific theme of
biomedical ethics. The analysis begins by exposing the context of medicine that, due
to significant scientific advances, death is no longer a natural outcome and has become
an enemy that must be overcome at any cost. The main objective of the research is to
clarify what are the possible solutions in the case of moral dilemmas of dysthanasia.
The most important discussion was the question about: to what extent can the doctor
stay only on the basis of a deontological morality to define the best moral choice and
what is the role of emotions for a truly moral action? The exhibition follows the following
steps: As a point of reference, I analyze the perspective of the old deontological ethics
in contrast to the new bioethical propedeutics, from a historical and conceptual
contextualization of the central issues of bioethics, medical ethics and hypocratic
ethics. I intend to show the different meanings or perspectives of a series of systematic
questions that at first glance seems to suggest a discussion of practical questions of
the application of certain rules, but it is not so easy to decide which reasons and criteria
guarantee a certain form application, a concrete medical practice of a moral character.
Second, I analyze philosophically the technoscientific, commercial-business and
humanitarian paradigms as a way to better understand dysthanasia. Third, I present
the fundamental perspective of current bioethics with an exposition of the new
biomedical ethics and the relativization of hypocratic morals. Finally, even though there
is still great difficulty in defining answers in this new perspective of bioethical
investigation, I concluded by the need to respect the patient's right to autonomy, with
emphasis on the substantial or evaluative aspects surrounding empathic engagement
in the doctor-patient relationship. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | Filosofia | |
dc.publisher | UFSM | |
dc.publisher | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia | |
dc.publisher | Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.subject | Distanásia | |
dc.subject | Ética médica | |
dc.subject | Bioética atual | |
dc.subject | Dysthanasia | |
dc.subject | Medical ethics | |
dc.subject | Current bioethics | |
dc.subject | Dysthanasia | |
dc.subject | Medical ethics | |
dc.subject | Current bioethics | |
dc.title | O problema da distanásia à luz da discussão bioética atual | |
dc.type | Dissertação | |