masterThesis
Os modos de representação de leitura do discurso outro na escrita acadêmica
Fecha
2017-12-04Registro en:
SOUZA, Maria Claudiane Silva de. Os modos de representação de leitura do discurso outro na escrita acadêmica. 2017. 111f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos da Linguagem) - Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2017.
Autor
Souza, Maria Claudiane Silva de
Resumen
This search talks about academic thematic and finds to analyse how is done the
representation of teoric readings by Mikhail Bakhtin used for researchers in building.
We proposed some questions: a) what are the teoric concept showed in analysed
dissertations? b) what´s the manner are represented linguisticaly the teoric concepts in
wrinting of researchers in building and c) how are built the speech´s representations of
readings in some academic readings comunity. Our general objective is analyse the
statement positions developed by researchers in bilding to defend their theory; and the
specific objectives are: a) describe the way the other says is found in linguistic
representation of writings of researchers in building and examine the position of reader
during the theoryzed works and b) analyse the way the academic reader comunity use
the teoric concepts in writings of disseetations. Our corpus is composed by ten (10)
dissetations of programs in post graduation in a course of Letter of a public university
and a private university during in a period between 2000 and 2015. Our theoric
reflexion is based in Santos (1997; 2008) e Chauí (2001; 2014) where they show many
challenges and crisis alived in contemporary university, the studies about the state
heterogenity and the representation of discussing of the other discussed by AuthierRevuz (1998; 2004) and the concept of cultural representation presented by Chartier
(1998; 2010; 2002; 2003). The analysis show that in writing of theory developed in
analysed researchs, the form of representation of Reading in a discussing of other refers
to the predominance of citations in discussing represented where the say of other is
represented by discussing of the voice of acountants of original theoric.