A eficácia do processo administrativo disciplinar no âmbito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Abstract

The overall objective is to analyze the effectiveness in establishing and conducting padsunder the UFRN.The PAD is the legally prescribed controlled instrument for the exercise of power, and may in the end result in administrative penalties. This type of process has two subspecies: disciplinary inquiry and disciplinary procedure. The disciplinary process unfolds in a series of acts beginning with the establishment within concierge and end with the judgment of the competent administrative authority. Indeed, one sees in the disciplinary process five phases: initiation; education; defense; report and judgment. The study was developed under the UFRN. The source documents was the public file of this institution. It was used as initiated processes of inclusion criteria and completed in 2013 related to teachers and administrative staff, totaling 43 cases. To analyze the processes after established criteria, it was considered PADs 29 involving 35 servers. The cases were separated by year of initiation and completion and reviewed in accordance with the final order of the manager. Later, they were separated by profession. Data were organized, categorized, coded and entered into Excel spreadsheet. The results were: 60% of public employees were male and 40% were technicians; 51.5% of the professionals were in the health field; 76% of the reasons the initiation of disciplinary proceedings were related charge accumulation; 76% of these cases were filed and only 21% of cases obtained their outcome in good time that corresponds to 60 days. To discuss the results used the descriptive statistics, and analysis grounded in the laws and regulations governing the establishment and conduct of disciplinary proceedings. It is hoped that this study will bring legal and legal foundation for the new commission trial.