dc.contributorUniversity of Bern
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:12:53Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:12:53Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-01
dc.identifierJournal of the American Dental Association, v. 139, n. 8, p. 1105-1112, 2008.
dc.identifier0002-8177
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70506
dc.identifier10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0313
dc.identifier2-s2.0-52449104337
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3919796
dc.description.abstractBackground. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of zero-value subtraction on the performance of two laser fluorescence (LF) devices developed to detect occlusal caries. Methods. The authors selected 119 permanent molars. Two examiners assessed three areas (cuspal, middle and cervical) of both mesial and distal portions of the buccal surface and one occlusal site using an LF device and an LF pen. For each tooth, the authors subtracted the value measured in the cuspal, middle and cervical areas in the buccal surface from the value measured in the respective occlusal site. Results. The authors observed differences among the readings for both devices in the cuspal, middle and cervical areas in the buccal surface as well as differences for both devices with and without the zero-value subtraction in the occlusal surface. When the authors did not perform the zero-value subtraction, they found statistically significant differences for sensitivity and accuracy for the LF device. When this was done with the LF pen, specificity increased and sensitivity decreased significantly. Conclusions. For the LF device, the zero-value subtraction decreased the sensitivity. For this reason, the authors concluded that clinicians can obtain measures with the LF device effectively without using zero-value subtraction. For the LF pen, however, the absence of the zero-value subtraction changed both the sensitivity and specificity, and so the authors concluded that clinicians should not eliminate this step from the procedure. Clinical Implications. When using the LF device, clinicians might not need to perform the zero-value subtraction; however, for the LF pen, clinicians should do so.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of the American Dental Association
dc.relation2.486
dc.relation0,898
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDIAGNOdent 2095
dc.subjectDIAGNOdent pen 2190
dc.subjectLaser fluorescence
dc.subjectOcclusal caries
dc.subjectZero value
dc.subjectdiagnostic agent
dc.subjectfluorescent dye
dc.subjectrhodamine
dc.subjectrhodamine B
dc.subjectarea under the curve
dc.subjectcalibration
dc.subjectdental caries
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectenamel
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjectfluorescence
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaser
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmedical photography
dc.subjectpathology
dc.subjectprediction and forecasting
dc.subjectroc curve
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectstandard
dc.subjecttooth crown
dc.subjectArea Under Curve
dc.subjectCalibration
dc.subjectDental Caries
dc.subjectDental Enamel
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectFluorescence
dc.subjectFluorescent Dyes
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLasers
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectPhotography, Dental
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectRhodamines
dc.subjectROC Curve
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectTooth Crown
dc.titleThe influence of zero-value subtraction on the performance of two laser fluorescence devices for detecting occlusal caries in vitro
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución