dc.creatorCox,Gary W
dc.date2006-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-07T15:40:18Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07T15:40:18Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-090X2006000100014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/388988
dc.descriptionScholars have suggested that electoral systems should be designed to promote (1) fair representation of parties, (2) good governmental performance and/or (3) adequate local representation. These three criteria pertain to three different kinds of accountability-the accountability of parties to their supporters; the accountability of governments to their citizens; and the accountability of MPs to their supporters-which cannot be simultaneously maximized. In this essay, I discuss each criterion in the abstract and with specific reference to the current Chilean electoral system and proposals to reform it
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Política
dc.sourceRevista de ciencia política (Santiago) v.26 n.1 2006
dc.subjectIngeniería electoral
dc.subjectReforma electoral
dc.titleEvaluating Electoral Systems
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución